RE: [Declude.Virus] Log Files

2002-11-27 Thread John Tolmachoff
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Doug McKee Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Log Files My log files are still about 50Mb daily even after the LOG_OK NONE option. Is that version related? Thanks, Doug

RE: [Declude.Virus] Log Files

2002-11-27 Thread Doug McKee
My log files are still about 50Mb daily even after the LOG_OK NONE option. Is that version related? Thanks, Doug >I have my logging set to LOW but my log files are still about 40-50Mb >per day. We do process about 100K emails. >What is the appropriate way to handle such a volume of info and not

RE: [Declude.Virus] Log Files

2002-11-13 Thread Doug McKee
Great tip Scott. Thanks, Doug -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.Virus-owner@;declude.com] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 7:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Log Files >I have my logging set to LOW but my

Re: [Declude.Virus] Log Files

2002-11-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have my logging set to LOW but my log files are still about 40-50Mb per day. We do process about 100K emails. What is the appropriate way to handle such a volume of info and not spend all day doing it? One option would be to use the "LOG_OK NONE" option -- if you add that line to the \IMail\

[Declude.Virus] Log Files

2002-11-13 Thread Doug McKee
I have my logging set to LOW but my log files are still about 40-50Mb per day. We do process about 100K emails. What is the appropriate way to handle such a volume of info and not spend all day doing it? Thanks, Doug --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.