RE: [Declude.Virus] JS.Downloader.Trojan

2004-10-13 Thread Jeff Maze
Now this morning, we get a W32.Netsky.P.dam virus via a data.zip file. I've submitted everything to F-Prot, but I'm surprised that it didn't catch these things. UGH! Do I need to change the virus.cfg file since upgrading to v1.81? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.Virus] JS.Downloader.Trojan

2004-10-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
Now this morning, we get a W32.Netsky.P.dam virus via a data.zip file. I've submitted everything to F-Prot, but I'm surprised that it didn't catch these things. UGH! The .dam means damaged, another term for a corrupt, non-viable variant. Since these are harmless, many AV programs do not

RE: [Declude.Virus] JS.Downloader.Trojan

2004-10-13 Thread Jeff Maze
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] JS.Downloader.Trojan Now this morning, we get a W32.Netsky.P.dam virus via a data.zip file. I've submitted everything to F-Prot, but I'm surprised that it didn't catch these things. UGH! The .dam means damaged, another term for a corrupt, non-viable variant

RE: [Declude.Virus] JS.Downloader.Trojan

2004-10-13 Thread Douglas Cohn
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] JS.Downloader.Trojan Now this morning, we get a W32.Netsky.P.dam virus via a data.zip file. I've submitted everything to F-Prot, but I'm