RE: [Declude.Virus] netsky p ?

2004-03-24 Thread Scott Fisher
I log all the attachments that come into my system in my Declude database. I searched the database for "deleted", "virus" and such then all "txt" attachments. These came up. So yes these are real attachments. Scott Fisher Director of IT Farm Progress Companies >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/24/04 10:4

Re: [Declude.Virus] netsky p ?

2004-03-24 Thread Jay Calvert
TECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 8:53 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] netsky p ? > > >They are still getting through.. > > Are your virus definition files up to date (Netsky.P just started spreading > within the past two days)? Are any getting caught (if so, the

RE: [Declude.Virus] netsky p ?

2004-03-24 Thread Markus Gufler
us     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 5:39 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] netsky p ? Markus Gufler wrote:   Anyone else has seen other attached information files about removed viru

RE: [Declude.Virus] netsky p ?

2004-03-26 Thread Douglas Cohn
es or just attachments that are not allowed. Thanks guys Doug -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 9:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] netsky p ? >So again the question is

RE: [Declude.Virus] netsky p ?

2004-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there any thought about changing this? IE removing the attachment and passing the email through. That is not likely to happen soon, as it requires MIME encoding (which Declude doesn't do at all -- it only does MIME decoding). -Scott --- Decl