Re: [Declude.Virus] Question on banned attachemnt

2003-09-19 Thread Bob McGregor
sorry, I looked at the wrong .SMD file, it indeed does not have an e x e. thanks john! bob On Friday, September 19, 2003 11:18 AM, John Tolmachoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I have seen a couple of those. > >If you look at the body, the attachment is not actually there, although the >mime header

RE: [Declude.Virus] Question on banned attachemnt

2003-09-19 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
I have seen a couple of those. If you look at the body, the attachment is not actually there, although the mime header for it is. John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.Virus-

Re: [Declude.Virus] Question on banned attachemnt

2003-09-19 Thread Bob McGregor
I just check the D*.SMD file and it appears to have an atatchment content-type=application/x-msdwonload;name="qnlc.exe" followed by attachment info. On Friday, September 19, 2003 11:18 AM, John Tolmachoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I have seen a couple of those. > >If you look at the body, the at