Re: [DUG]: similar type is used. [virus warning]

2001-07-08 Thread Nic Wise
> A few lines of text at the bottom of a message that you can easily ignore. > last time I checked, they were at the top. > Well that's interesting. I don't get any spam to the addresses I have signed > on. I get lots. > There were some other issues raised like archives, address munging, diges

RE: [DUG]: similar type is used. [virus warning]

2001-07-08 Thread Patrick Dunford
Correction. Most of the groups I'm on haven't received _any_ advertising for some time. Usually they just get a single line about terms and conditions. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Nic Wise > Sent: Monday, 9 July 2001 17:03 > To:

RE: [DUG]: similar type is used. [virus warning]

2001-07-08 Thread Patrick Dunford
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Nic Wise > Sent: Monday, 9 July 2001 17:03 > To: Multiple recipients of list delphi > Subject: Re: [DUG]: similar type is used. [virus warning] > snip > > > I'm a user of Yahoo Groups and it offers heap

RE: [DUG]: TWebBrowser and Enter key

2001-07-08 Thread Patrick Dunford
I have found also (just today) that the shortcut menu does not work. Copying text or shortcuts from a page in a WebBrowser control does not work (doesn't get copied). > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Alex Kouznetsov > Sent: Friday, 6

Re: [DUG]: similar type is used. [virus warning]

2001-07-08 Thread Nic Wise
> Maybe they didn't "promise" anything, but there was certainly a proposal to > upgrade the software, and I remember it being discussed. yup, it was discussed, but as there are around 150 domains on the mail server (last time I looked, which was about a year ago), moving it over to a new server i

RE: [DUG]: similar type is used. [virus warning]

2001-07-08 Thread Patrick Dunford
Maybe they didn't "promise" anything, but there was certainly a proposal to upgrade the software, and I remember it being discussed. I'm a user of Yahoo Groups and it offers heaps more options. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Nic Wi

Re: [DUG]: similar type is used. [virus warning]

2001-07-08 Thread Nic Wise
They promised them? Not that I recall. Might have been a "we would like to..." but not a "we will" The list software that is used can't do it, and is still in use.. N - Original Message - From: "Patrick Dunford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Multiple recipients of list delphi" <[EMAI

RE: [DUG]: similar type is used. [virus warning]

2001-07-08 Thread Patrick Dunford
I have ZoneAlarm running and it renamed it hpbmset.zl9 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Edward Aretino > Sent: Monday, 9 July 2001 15:12 > To: Multiple recipients of list delphi > Subject: Re: [DUG]: similar type is used. [virus warni

RE: [DUG]: similar type is used. [virus warning]

2001-07-08 Thread Patrick Dunford
Yes, its a great pity the administrators of this list have still not gotten around to blocking attachments, and all those other wonderful things that were promised > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Edward Aretino > Sent: Monday, 9 July

RE: Virus Found in message "[DUG] similar type is used."

2001-07-08 Thread David O'Brien
> Norton AntiVirus found a virus in an attachment from gajo. > > > Attachment: hpbmset.exe > Virus name: W32.Magistr.24876@mm > Action taken: Clean succeeded : > File status: Clean > Valid command because $USERID is a variable of type string. > > > > > 4 > . > 0 > > > > S > t > r >

Re: [DUG]: similar type is used. [virus warning]

2001-07-08 Thread Edward Aretino
Look out folks, Norton tells me this regarding the attachment (hpbmset.exe) from gajo: Scan type: Realtime Protection Scan Event: Virus Found! Virus name: W32.Magistr.24876@mm File: D:\docs\Internet\Eudora\attach\hpbmset.exe Location: D:\docs\Internet\Eudora\attach Action taken: Clean succe

RE: [DUG]: Tapi components

2001-07-08 Thread NIRAV KAKU
Steve, I found a component called TTapiDial. Works pretty well on ME (thats WindowsME ; )). I modified the source code slightly because I think the header he used is different from the header JEDI converted but it works fine. regards, NIRAV KAKU On 9 Jul 01, at 13:58, Steve Aish wrote:

RE: [DUG]: Tapi components

2001-07-08 Thread Steve Aish
Nirav, I don't know of any Tapi components that are free and actually work... I have done some work with Tapi but I ended up finding a component that sort of worked and then converted a lot of my old VB code that worked and added these together to make something that actually worked the way I wa

RE: [DUG]: Exe Size

2001-07-08 Thread David O'Brien
I just received this message. Whats going on with the list? I am on the list from three different accounts, and get different messages in all of them at different times. This one is a month old, and has only just arrived. But I have it at the other accounts. Dave. -Original Message- From

RE: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStringList)

2001-07-08 Thread Patrick Dunford
It would be a fair assumption though (a) to use TCollectionItem practicably you will be creating a derivative class (b) it is designed more for use with visual components that have a component editor at design time and is used in conjunction with various types of visual components. > -Origi

RE: [DUG]: Can I read an object where a record worked?

2001-07-08 Thread Roser, Wayne
Thanks Dennis, that's what I ended up doing. I just thought I was, um, you know, cheating (eyes dart around the DUG virtual room at the experienced OO coders sitting in the jury box). Wayne -Original Message- From: Dennis Chuah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 9 July 2001 10:44 To

RE: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStringList)

2001-07-08 Thread Dennis Chuah
> To get around this little problem when you need to keep lists of objects > created dynamically, Delphi provides the TList class. You can use > a TList or > make a derivative from it. It would be usual to override the destructor to > ensure all the memory is freed in your objects. In that case,

RE: [DUG]: Can I read an object where a record worked?

2001-07-08 Thread Dennis Chuah
Wayne, Create an object to wrap around your record. TMyRecordType = record field1: array[1..3] of char; field2: array[1..175] of char; end; TMyClassType = class private Frec: TMyRecordType; // Get and set method

RE: [DUG]: If you had to choose (win98se or WinMe)

2001-07-08 Thread Kuet-Fung Chong
On the topic of Win98 and ME ... Is it a known bug in D4 that ExpandFileName() function behaves differently on Win98 compared to NT and W2K Pro? e.g. sAppPath := ExtractFilePath(Application.ExeName); sAppPath := ExpandFileName(sAppPath+'..\'); //get parent directory sDataPath := sAppPath

RE: [DUG]: If you had to choose (win98se or WinMe)

2001-07-08 Thread Alan Rose
No. I think anyone who has already been on Win2000 will tell you the 9x series is nothing compared to the new Win architecture for stability. I dont believe there is anything to gain from going from 98 to ME. I would go for Win2000 or wait for XP. Cheers. PS This is from a programming perspective.

[DUG]: Can I read an object where a record worked?

2001-07-08 Thread Roser, Wayne
I have been reading fixed length records from a file using: Read(AFileName, ARecordName); I wanted to convert the record to a class so it could have methods so I changed the definition from something like: TMyRecordType = record field1: array[1..3] of char;

RE: [DUG]: If you had to choose (win98se or WinMe)

2001-07-08 Thread John Christenhusz
Is it worth it to move from 98 to ME at all? John > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Maurice Butler > Sent: Saturday, 07 July, 2001 11:40 > To: Multiple recipients of list delphi > Subject: Re: [DUG]: If you had to choose (win98se or W

RE: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStringList)

2001-07-08 Thread James Low
I think ... the main advantage of Objects over say record structures is that they are allocated on the heap and thus you can have as many of them as memory available on the system. The other advantage is that objects have their own methods. Therefore an object can be far more self-contained and ea