[DUG]: sockets programmers.

2001-07-19 Thread Terry Johnson
Hi Matt, I wrote an FTP client a while ago - what's your problem? Terry --- New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz To UnSub, send email to: [E

[DUG]: right-click on listboxes

2001-07-19 Thread Ross Levis
Is there a simple way of forcing an item to be selected in a listbox by right-clicking the item before a Popup Menu is displayed. I want it to work the way a ListView does where right-click does select the item. Currently the user has to left-click & then right-click. Cheers, Ross. ---

Re: [DUG]: Destroying Objects

2001-07-19 Thread jnorth
No different JED >However, if I define the objects as 'class(TObject)', rather than just 'class', >is this any different? ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of th

Re: [DUG]: Destroying Objects

2001-07-19 Thread Ross Levis
Neven MacEwan wrote: > the std answer is NO especially when the object has no owner. Thanks for all the replies! I thought it was a simple Yes/No question. My concern is with simple static objects defined as 'class' which I'm linking to listbox.items.objects. I presume since I'm not defining

[DUG]: sockets programmers.

2001-07-19 Thread Matthew Comb
Any delphi sockets programmers around at the moment - particularly people with experience in ftp. Matt. --- New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://www.delphi.or

D6 Timestamp Error: was [DUG]: Delphi 5 & 6...

2001-07-19 Thread Staff at Belding
On the D6 Timestamp error.   The following is a quote from a posting by Jeff Overcash of "TeamB":   "  D6 has a problem with MSecsToTimeStamp in that if you have MSecs less than a days worth the returned TimeStamp is invalid and TimeStampToDateTime will raise an EConvertError on the retur

RE: [DUG]: TAPI - call monitoring; not really Delphi specific:

2001-07-19 Thread James Low
Yep, thats it - now I am back on track. Thanks heaps Nello, I shall have fun. -Original Message- From: Nello Sestini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 July 2001 13:49 To: Multiple recipients of list delphi Subject: Re: [DUG]: TAPI - call monitoring; not really Delphi specific: I think

Re: [DUG]: Delphi 5 & 6...

2001-07-19 Thread Trevor Jones
I have 4, 5, and 6 all installed on the same machine.   The only problem I have is with D6 itself: BEWARE if you use TTimeFields in your database you may run into problems.  Certainly with IBXpress TTimeFields are currently broken.  There is a workaround but not if you use packages. -

Re: [DUG]: TAPI - call monitoring; not really Delphi specific:

2001-07-19 Thread Nello Sestini
I think it goes like this: you lineopen() lines you're interested in specifying the LINECALLPRIVILEGE_MONITOR option this makes you a "monitor" of the line and you will then get LINE_CALLSTATE messages notifying you of state changes on the line. The LINE_CALLSTATE message passes a LINE_CALL str

Re: [DUG]: Delphi 5 & 6...

2001-07-19 Thread jnorth
as long as you install in order of release you can run d1 - d6 on the same machine. Uninstalling can be another issue though... JED >Like an idiot I did not read the thread on this the other day. So apologies in advance for asking this again. Can Delphi 5 >Enterprise and Delphi 6 Enterprise be

[DUG]: Delphi 5 & 6...

2001-07-19 Thread Donovan J. Edye
G'Day, Like an idiot I did not read the thread on this the other day. So apologies in advance for asking this again. Can Delphi 5 Enterprise and Delphi 6 Enterprise be run on the same machine without any problems? TIA -- Donovan ---

[DUG]: TAPI - call monitoring; not really Delphi specific:

2001-07-19 Thread James Low
Is there any way for me to monitor the completion, and gather information from, ALL calls made through a PABX, using TAPI (TAPI 2 compliant PABX). Unfortunately I cannot use the SMDR Port but still need to catch all calls, not just those initiated on our client machine(s) (through TAPI). I've sca

RE: [DUG]: Destroying Objects

2001-07-19 Thread Dennis Chuah
I assume you mean interfaces. Take a look at the following simple example. If you call Bar, it creates an instance of TFoo, assigning its IUnknown interface to Unk. When the procedure exits, Unk goes out of scope and will cause TFoo to be freed. unit Test; interface uses SysUtils, Classes, For

Re: [DUG]: Destroying Objects

2001-07-19 Thread Chrissy R
> If you don't feel like freeing objects, then program in Java or C# (D-flat), > or use interfaces (be careful how you reference the interface). I read about this once. I understood the theory but the practical side of it went over my head. Any chance of a snippet of fully working code that dem