Original Message-
> From: Sandeep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 3:24 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
> Subject: Re: [DUG]: Delphi and IBX vs IBO
>
>
> I don't think IBX is good enough yet to do some serious
> development. IBO on
On 25 Nov 2000, at 11:25, Gary T. Benner wrote:
> I just hooked up TIBODatabase to a TIBOTable and connected to an Interbase Database,
>then placed a standard TDatasource and
> TDBGrid and connected then, and with no code got a view of my Table - no BDE, no
>code.
True. But there are other I
(Nevrona),
InfoPower, Orpheus.
Regards
Russell
- Original Message -
From: Sandeep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Delphi and IBX vs IBO
> I don't think IBX is g
[Reply]
Hi all,
At 15:36 on 24/11/2000 Sandeep wrote
>IBO on other hand has a proven track record and has
>a lot of components to go with it. But they don't work with standard
>controls.
Not correct. While there are early IBO versions of common controls, IBO now has a
direct replacement for
I don't think IBX is good enough yet to do some serious
development. IBO on other hand has a proven track record and has
a lot of components to go with it. But they don't work with standard
controls.
You also have option of using FIB components.
I think the best option will be to stick to IB
Hello Team Delphi
I am moving a Delphi - BDE - Paradox application to another level. I hope
to replace the BDE and with Interbase and some connection components,
particularly now IB6 incurs no license fees.
The way the application and its controls connect to IB is the first issue I
want to se
