+1 for @Veto
a.) because it's already established in Seam3 - easier to transit Seam projects
b.) because this will also be used in the CDI-1.1 spec itself [1]. Thus users
will be familiar with it.
LieGrue,
strub
[1]
Altering my vote to @Exclude as it seems more intuitive
+1 @Exclude
-1 @Veto
1. I would like to see CDI 1.1 adopt the same same if possible.
2. My impression from the user forums is that @Veto in solder has been
lightly used outside of module development. The impact of renaming
during the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13176342#comment-13176342
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on DELTASPIKE-36:
in myfaces codi it's handled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated DELTASPIKE-36:
---
Issue Type: Task (was: New Feature)
Summary: review and discuss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13176347#comment-13176347
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on DELTASPIKE-36:
we could think about using the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13176350#comment-13176350
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on DELTASPIKE-36:
if we agree on a manual
Do you have a link to where this is in OWB? example maybe?
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Gerhard Petracek (Commented) (JIRA)
j...@apache.org wrote:
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13176342#comment-13176342
]
Gerhard Petracek edited comment on DELTASPIKE-36 at 12/27/11 11:30 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13176347#comment-13176347
]
Gerhard Petracek edited comment on DELTASPIKE-36 at 12/27/11 11:41 PM:
Gerhard,
Apologies for jumping the gun. didn't read right and thought this was the
discuss.
John
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
hi john,
thx for the question. i added the link to the jira issue.
i'll start a thread about it (similar
+1 for @Unmanaged
(+1 for @Exclude if it's the only alternative we can agree on)
regards,
gerhard
2011/12/28 Marius Bogoevici marius.bogoev...@gmail.com
As if we didn't have enough alternatives, here's another one that popped
up while discussing with Gerhard the relative merits of @Veto and
Unmanaged sounds a little confusing. this simply represents the default
implementation of the bean, correct? so an app developer can create a
manual producer... right?
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for @Unmanaged
(+1 for @Exclude if
hi john,
the basic contract is still the same (the implementation will be the
implementation which is currently available in seam3) - just the name is
more expressive.
regards,
gerhard
2011/12/28 John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
Unmanaged sounds a little confusing. this simply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-29?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek resolved DELTASPIKE-29.
Resolution: Later
review and discuss BeanNames
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-37?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13176418#comment-13176418
]
Gerhard Petracek edited comment on DELTASPIKE-37 at 12/28/11 2:53 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated DELTASPIKE-36:
---
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Task)
Parent: DELTASPIKE-2
review and
Hello,
1. just to confirm : this functionnality would be enabled per JAR (beans.xml ?)
2. wouldn't it be interesting to add something link exclude-annotation ?
CDI would the ignore classes marked with those annotations.
This could benefit some use cases like Spring / CDI integration when user
17 matches
Mail list logo
