i think we can either to send a mail to
http://apache.org/dev/infra-mail.html , or to ping on #asfinfra.
another way could be to open a jira on infra project but i think we should
talk with them before.
- Romain
2012/7/27 Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com
Romain, what is the best way to take this
This sounds reasonable to me as well.
On Jul 27, 2012, at 1:10 AM, Shane Bryzak sbry...@redhat.com wrote:
I had a quick chat with Pete and Jason and they brought me up to speed.
After much consideration I think the best way to proceed would be 4.b), with
the more complex features such as
+1 for 4b
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz
boleslaw.dawidow...@gmail.com wrote:
This sounds reasonable to me as well.
On Jul 27, 2012, at 1:10 AM, Shane Bryzak sbry...@redhat.com wrote:
I had a quick chat with Pete and Jason and they brought me up to speed.
After
+1
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Mehdi Heidarzadeh heidarzad...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: IDM impl feedback
+1 for 4b
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz
+1 4b
On Jul 26, 2012 4:41 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Oki, here we go.
We had a quick chat about where we basically stand today.
This is not intended to be a a 'what shall be' but more a 'what do we
have' + 'what do we really need' email.
1.) What we have today:
I've
4b looks a good way to go for me as well.
On 2012-07-27 9:44 AM, Cody Lerum wrote:
+1 4b
On Jul 26, 2012 4:41 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Oki, here we go.
We had a quick chat about where we basically stand today.
This is not intended to be a a 'what shall be' but more a
Gerhard Petracek created DELTASPIKE-248:
---
Summary: missing check of EntityTransaction#getRollbackOnly in
ResourceLocalPersistenceStrategy
Key: DELTASPIKE-248
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13423910#comment-13423910
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on DELTASPIKE-248:
-
i'll push the fix asap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated DELTASPIKE-249:
Description:
step #1 remove file (based on the discussion [1] on the mailing
hi @ all,
since also everybody involved in the original implementation agreed with
4b, i've created a jira-ticket [1] for the first two steps.
please review the changes for step #1. if there are no objections, i'll
push it to our repository in two days and i'll close the jira-tickets
related to
You're thinking in v0.4 then? There's not a LOT of new stuff in v0.3 but we
have waited a while to release, we should probably get started soon on the
release.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
I'd rather have the mini-auth + some composite components + a
hi jason,
i removed them as well (in the preview), because they don't work without
org.apache.deltaspike.security.api.idm.User.
since we agreed on a different/new goal, we can re-visit those parts for
the upcoming module.
(maybe we will re-add e.g. some of the events, but for now we don't know
That's fine, we can address this at a later time. I'd prefer to get v0.3
out the door sooner.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
hi jason,
i removed them as well (in the preview), because they don't work without
13 matches
Mail list logo
