[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13608914#comment-13608914
]
John D. Ament commented on DELTASPIKE-273:
--
I think it's understood that if
All,
I'd like to open the floor to anyone else who may have some questions or
concerns about doing DS-273. Personally its something I need in a project
I'm working on, seeing the bug open made it a good idea for me.
As Gerhard mentions, if you have a slow source it will be slow to respond
for
All,
I'd like to open the floor to discussion for porting JMS 2 features to
DeltaSpike, specifically the features that added some CDI capabilities to
JMS.
Details of my rough proposal are here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-324
Importing these features start to deprecate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John D. Ament reassigned DELTASPIKE-324:
Assignee: John D. Ament
Backport JMS2 Like functionality to DeltaSpike
Hi
i'm globally -1 for redoing something which will exist somewhere else
(basically if somebody wants JavaEE just let him use JavaEE, CDI doesn't
need the full stack IMO). Was my point for JPA, more again on JMS.
It is great to add feature before the specs not once it is (or almost) done.
Maybe
That's typically more pain for a user, and may cause issues with a service
contract. I say we implement this is DS for those who need it.
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Arne Limburg
arne.limb...@openknowledge.de wrote:
We should find out if one can simply use
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
I tend to lean towards +1 simply because EE-7 containers will take another
year (or 2) to become used in projects.
Agreed. I think a lot of people learned lessons jumping in to GF3 quickly
after release for EE 6.
I
Arne,
Not sure I follow. Typically the only case where you would embed a JMS
implementation is in a Tomcat/Spring configuration. There are
complications trying to bootstrap a JMS server within an EE container, most
require some JNDI entries to be made, or container provided configuration
Ill rephrase a bit. I m rather -0 about it and -1 since a lot of others
stuff are needed before.
Le 21 mars 2013 22:50, Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.de a
écrit :
We should find out if one can simply use a JMS 2.0 implementation and put
it into an deployment. If that will be possible,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13609648#comment-13609648
]
John D. Ament commented on DELTASPIKE-273:
--
I think perhaps we should discuss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13609658#comment-13609658
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on DELTASPIKE-273:
-
i prefer that as well. i
All,
When I look at open issues for DeltaSpike, all I see is under [1] ; looking
at this list it's not clear which are ready to be done or which need more
info. In addition when I look at [2] we end up with 50 open issues.
V 0.3 was released in August 2012. I'd like to help get DS to a 0.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13609760#comment-13609760
]
John D. Ament edited comment on DELTASPIKE-273 at 3/22/13 1:07 AM:
hi john,
[1] is the most blocking one we need for v0.4.
regards,
gerhard
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-289
2013/3/22 John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
All,
When I look at open issues for DeltaSpike, all I see is under [1] ; looking
at this list it's not clear
Gerhard,
But currently it's assigned to Mark. So to outsiders, who maybe haven't
been playing close court, someone's already handling it.
Since CODI has a Window Scope, I'm assuming that it's simply a port from
CODI to DS.
John
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Gerhard Petracek
hi john,
no - it will be a new implementation aligned with the new ClientWindow api
(of jsf 2.2).
afterwards i finish my tickets (which need it) and then we are ready for a
release.
imo the rest is nice to have for v0.4
regards,
gerhard
2013/3/22 John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
short addition:
and we have to create a new module for DS-113 (and use a different proxy
lib (or commons proxy)).
regards,
gerhard
2013/3/22 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
hi john,
no - it will be a new implementation aligned with the new ClientWindow api
(of jsf 2.2).
17 matches
Mail list logo
