Gerhard Petracek created DELTASPIKE-325:
---
Summary: upgrade to owb-arquillian-standalone
Key: DELTASPIKE-325
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-325
Project: DeltaSpike
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek updated DELTASPIKE-325:
Summary: upgrade to owb-arquillian-standalone and owb 1.1.8 (was: upgrade
to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek resolved DELTASPIKE-325.
-
Resolution: Fixed
upgrade to owb-arquillian-standalone and owb 1.1.8
Gerhard,
Do you agree w/ Cody's synopsis? I think mimic is what you're trying to
describe, but threw me off when you said aligned; I assumed you meant be
dependent on.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
hi john,
no - we will just create our
yea, +1 for a release pretty soon.
Will try to get my head around the WindowId stuff soon
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2013 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: Pending items
John D. Ament created DELTASPIKE-326:
Summary: Introduce isScannable to ConfigSource
Key: DELTASPIKE-326
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-326
Project: DeltaSpike
hi @ all,
imo it's more a basic question.
if we do it for jms 2, we also have to (/should) do it for other
specifications like bv 1.1
regards,
gerhard
2013/3/21 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
Ill rephrase a bit. I m rather -0 about it and -1 since a lot of others
stuff are needed
yes but JMS is clearly not the most used
can't we push it for the 1.0?
users really wait the first 1.0 to use DS and adding JMS now simply looks
like forgetting more common use cases
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog:
@ romain: +1
regards,
gerhard
2013/3/23 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
yes but JMS is clearly not the most used
can't we push it for the 1.0?
users really wait the first 1.0 to use DS and adding JMS now simply looks
like forgetting more common use cases
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
As much as I want to see JMS added, I agree it should be after 1.0. We need
to get this pushed out.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
@ romain: +1
regards,
gerhard
2013/3/23 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
yes but JMS is
10 matches
Mail list logo