[jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-325) upgrade to owb-arquillian-standalone

2013-03-23 Thread Gerhard Petracek (JIRA)
Gerhard Petracek created DELTASPIKE-325: --- Summary: upgrade to owb-arquillian-standalone Key: DELTASPIKE-325 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-325 Project: DeltaSpike

[jira] [Updated] (DELTASPIKE-325) upgrade to owb-arquillian-standalone and owb 1.1.8

2013-03-23 Thread Gerhard Petracek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek updated DELTASPIKE-325: Summary: upgrade to owb-arquillian-standalone and owb 1.1.8 (was: upgrade to

[jira] [Resolved] (DELTASPIKE-325) upgrade to owb-arquillian-standalone and owb 1.1.8

2013-03-23 Thread Gerhard Petracek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gerhard Petracek resolved DELTASPIKE-325. - Resolution: Fixed upgrade to owb-arquillian-standalone and owb 1.1.8

Re: Pending items for release

2013-03-23 Thread John D. Ament
Gerhard, Do you agree w/ Cody's synopsis? I think mimic is what you're trying to describe, but threw me off when you said aligned; I assumed you meant be dependent on. On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: hi john, no - we will just create our

Re: Pending items for release

2013-03-23 Thread Mark Struberg
yea, +1 for a release pretty soon. Will try to get my head around the WindowId stuff soon LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2013 9:04 PM Subject: Re: Pending items

[jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-326) Introduce isScannable to ConfigSource

2013-03-23 Thread John D. Ament (JIRA)
John D. Ament created DELTASPIKE-326: Summary: Introduce isScannable to ConfigSource Key: DELTASPIKE-326 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-326 Project: DeltaSpike

Re: DISCUSS DeltaSpike-324

2013-03-23 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi @ all, imo it's more a basic question. if we do it for jms 2, we also have to (/should) do it for other specifications like bv 1.1 regards, gerhard 2013/3/21 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com Ill rephrase a bit. I m rather -0 about it and -1 since a lot of others stuff are needed

Re: DISCUSS DeltaSpike-324

2013-03-23 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
yes but JMS is clearly not the most used can't we push it for the 1.0? users really wait the first 1.0 to use DS and adding JMS now simply looks like forgetting more common use cases *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau* *Blog:

Re: DISCUSS DeltaSpike-324

2013-03-23 Thread Gerhard Petracek
@ romain: +1 regards, gerhard 2013/3/23 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com yes but JMS is clearly not the most used can't we push it for the 1.0? users really wait the first 1.0 to use DS and adding JMS now simply looks like forgetting more common use cases *Romain Manni-Bucau*

Re: DISCUSS DeltaSpike-324

2013-03-23 Thread Jason Porter
As much as I want to see JMS added, I agree it should be after 1.0. We need to get this pushed out. On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: @ romain: +1 regards, gerhard 2013/3/23 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com yes but JMS is