+1 This is nice for Java5 servers (which there are still a few out there).
Of course this means that we should also not use other Java6 features like
String.isEmpty() and stuff.
Basically this VOTE is about should we support Java5 ?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From:
+1
I really like this way of configuration. It should definitively be
part of DeltaSpike.
Christian
2011/12/22 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
+1
Please note that CodiConfig doesn't contain any logic! It's really just a
marker interface to mark our SPI classes which are to be
Hi Gerhard,
Nice news !
Now how can we be added to incubator group ?
regards,
Antoine
Le 22 déc. 2011 à 16:22, Gerhard Petracek a écrit :
hi @ all,
today i contacted our great infra team and now we have our git
repository (thx to joe).
i added the details to [1]. everybody who is a
deltaspike website
--
Key: DELTASPIKE-33
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-33
Project: DeltaSpike
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Gerhard Petracek
Assignee: Gerhard Petracek
see:
antoine_sd
or anoinesd if _ is a special character.
Antoine SABOT-DURAND
Le 22 déc. 2011 à 20:16, Gerhard Petracek a écrit :
hi @ all initial committers,
if you are listed at the initial committer section of [1] (and you aren't
an apache committer already), please reply with your
kenfinnigan
Thanks
Ken
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 22, 2011, at 14:16, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
hi @ all initial committers,
if you are listed at the initial committer section of [1] (and you aren't
an apache committer already), please reply with your preferred
create public key file
--
Key: DELTASPIKE-34
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-34
Project: DeltaSpike
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Gerhard Petracek
Assignee: Gerhard Petracek
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-34?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek resolved DELTASPIKE-34.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.0.0-incubating
create public key
I'll go with lightguardjp, unless people object to non-name handles :) in
that case I'll go with jporter
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 13:43, Ken Finnigan k...@kenfinnigan.me wrote:
kenfinnigan
Thanks
Ken
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 22, 2011, at 14:16, Gerhard Petracek
marius
On 2011-12-22, at 3:43 PM, Ken Finnigan wrote:
kenfinnigan
Thanks
Ken
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 22, 2011, at 14:16, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
wrote:
hi @ all initial committers,
if you are listed at the initial committer section of [1] (and you aren't
+1
Needs a better name though :P
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:03, Christian Kaltepoth
christ...@kaltepoth.dewrote:
+1
I really like this way of configuration. It should definitively be
part of DeltaSpike.
Christian
2011/12/22 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
+1
Please note that
+0.7 I'm with Mark, I like the idea, but I'd like to discuss it more when
we get to the logging discussions.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:07, Christian Kaltepoth
christ...@kaltepoth.dewrote:
+1
2011/12/22 John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com:
+1 (since I wrote the equivalent for solder, sort
+0 It's not that big on my list, and I think we have other issues as well
that take priority over this, such as logging or i18n.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:12, Christian Kaltepoth
christ...@kaltepoth.dewrote:
-0.5 I don't think this would be very useful.
2011/12/22 Gerhard Petracek
What would the drawbacks be of putting the api/impl code in completely
separate modules? Seemingly this would solve the packaging problems
and the impl jar could simply shade the api jar.
Matt
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 I'm fine with this.
We have it in Seam, and Weld for that Java 5 support, but I'd prefer to
stay on 6+. We *could* do a version compiled for jdk5. But then we get into
issues of which branch, making sure it's all Java 5 features, etc.
-0.5
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:45, José Rodolfo Freitas
Will do as soon as I get a user account
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 14:15, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.comwrote:
hi @ all committers,
you can add your public key to [1] and push it (as soon as you have an
apache-id).
regards,
gerhard
[1] http://s.apache.org/Yuc
--
Jason
I really like the possibility of creating user extensible metadata for
tests and executions. I like less having to specify it in both the test and
the arquillian.xml, but that probably can't be helped.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 21:31, Dan Allen dan.j.al...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at
17 matches
Mail list logo
