hi john,
i know.
you are listed as an initial committer - that means:
you will get an apache-id, you will be part of the incubator group (- you
will get commit btw. push rights) and you will be a ppmc member.
- i don't see an issue.
regards,
gerhard
2011/12/23 John D. Ament
+1 for a new name.
(initially it was a bit more. we reduced the functionality later on.)
we could call it e.g. ModuleConfig
regards,
gerhard
2011/12/23 Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com
+1
Needs a better name though :P
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:03, Christian Kaltepoth
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13175335#comment-13175335
]
Jason Porter commented on DELTASPIKE-8:
---
Looks like everyone is in agreement for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-9?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Porter resolved DELTASPIKE-9.
---
Resolution: Later
This feature was tabled for later.
review and discuss
fyi: please check [1] before you answer.
[2] is the implementation used in Solder. The use case for it really seems
more like @Typed, but in practice it's being used to go around BDA issues
in containers.
the basic concept:
Provides a bean with a type and qualifiers that may be different than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13175348#comment-13175348
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on DELTASPIKE-20:
if you provide a name,
fyi: please check [1] before you answer.
[2] contains documentation for the AnnotationBuilder and [2a] contains the
code for the BeanBuilders.
the basic concept:
Builder classes for creating beans based on an AnnotatedType, and modifying
the metadata of that AnnotatedType, also in the case of
I like the annotation filter!
(Don't yet understand why isn't that a Qualifier but a Stereotype, but that's
minor stuff)
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Dan Allen dan.j.al...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 2:10 AM
We could try to use retro-translate to produce java5 compatible artifacts later?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 4:45 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]
If we wanted to try it later that's fine.
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:41, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
We could try to use retro-translate to produce java5 compatible artifacts
later?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com
To:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13175363#comment-13175363
]
Jason Porter commented on DELTASPIKE-33:
Awestruct (http://awestruct.org) was
+1
2011/12/23 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com:
+1 if we keep the impl in impl-bda [1]
regards,
gerhard
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/Project+Structure
2011/12/23 Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com
fyi: please check [1] before you answer.
Hi Marius--I would suggest moving your entry to before mine so we keep
them sorted alphabetically by id.
Matt
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 7:53 AM, mar...@apache.org wrote:
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master 88ff7635a - 37414d7d3
Added myself as a PPMC member
Project:
i would suggest that we start with an approach which is available right
now and to refactor the tests later on (as soon as the mentioned approach
is available in arquillian).
@dan:
yes - the basic idea is very similar to manila.
+1 for adding the basic approach to arquillian itself and using it.
I'll get to this today, as soon as the kids let me work :) (wife is still down
sick with food poisoning it seems)
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 23, 2011, at 11:09, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
i would suggest that we start with an approach which is available right
now and
Veto is rationally the most appropriate since it directly translates to
calling ProcessAnnotatedType#veto()
However, I'd like to offer one other alternative:
@Skip
While veto describes what the extension is doing internally, skip is how
the developer perceives the result of the action. The
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 15:20, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.comwrote:
i said: if there are too many open questions right now,...
Understood.
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
+0.5 for @Skip
as mentioned in the original thread @Veto is accurate from a technical
perspective, but it sounds strange for users who aren't aware of the
mechanism behind.
if we are talking only about @Veto vs @Skip and not about the other
alternatives: +1 for @Skip
regards,
gerhard
Dan, I also like the results Andrew and Aslak had with that for the new
Arquillian page.
Could you probably provide a skeleton and sample integration which we can tweak?
Best would be if you just create a git-clone and provide that on github. then
we play around with it and if it turns out to
What about @Exclude?
Cheers,
Arne
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Dezember 2011 21:28
An: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] [DELTASPIKE-8] @Veto
+0.5 for @Skip
as mentioned in the
+1 for @Veto because Seam3 users are already aware of it. That doesn't mean
that I don't like @Skip, but I see no real benefit, and it would be harder for
Seam3 users to move migrate.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
To:
hi arne,
would be also ok for me - +1
regards,
gerhard
2011/12/23 Arne Limburg arne.limb...@openknowledge.de
What about @Exclude?
Cheers,
Arne
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Dezember 2011 21:28
An:
+1
regards,
gerhard
2011/12/23 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Dan, I also like the results Andrew and Aslak had with that for the new
Arquillian page.
Could you probably provide a skeleton and sample integration which we can
tweak?
Best would be if you just create a git-clone and
Hi guys,
I just saw that http://incubator.apache.org already lists DeltaSpike
as a current project, but it links to
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/deltaspike.html which results in
a 404 Not Found.
WDYT of creating a very basic index.apt and doing a maven site-deploy?
IMO it can't hurt to
I agree that it potentially puts some bumps in the road, but the benefit is
that you can import that parent into the IDE when it's adjacent to the
other modules. When it's above the modules, at least in Eclipse, it can't
be imported without having all the submodules as resources inside the
parent
Hi,
Oh, I did not know that. I am using IntelliJ, no problems here ;)
Regards,
Jakob
2011/12/24 Dan Allen dan.j.al...@gmail.com:
I agree that it potentially puts some bumps in the road, but the benefit is
that you can import that parent into the IDE when it's adjacent to the
other modules.
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 13:09, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.comwrote:
i would suggest that we start with an approach which is available right
now and to refactor the tests later on (as soon as the mentioned approach
is available in arquillian).
Speaking to that approach, you'll
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 04:39, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
I like the annotation filter!
(Don't yet understand why isn't that a Qualifier but a Stereotype, but
that's minor stuff)
Well, this can't be anything related to CDI since Arquillian isn't just for
CDI. I just named it
Btw, I do *strongly* recommend using awestruct for creating the website. In
10+ years of creating websites (and applications) I've never encountered
anything remotely as productive...esp when all you want to do is create web
pages with information.
-Dan
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 18:25, Dan Allen
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 15:32, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Dan, I also like the results Andrew and Aslak had with that for the new
Arquillian page.
...that was mostly done by me, Aslak and Sarah :)
I think we are talking about two different things. For Arquillian, we have
used
Hi Jakob!
This was needed as we don't maintain the checkstyle plugin as separat project
(because of using GIT).
Thus we did need to move the 'parent' for the code projects one layer deeper...
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
To:
+1
How about SpikeConfig?
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for a new name.
(initially it was a bit more. we reduced the functionality later on.)
we could call it e.g. ModuleConfig
regards,
gerhard
2011/12/23 Jason Porter
I give those surefire issues a try and push it if it looks good.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Dan Allen dan.j.al...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2011 12:14 AM
Subject: Re: basic decisions: test setup
On Fri,
Looks like I'll be brushing up the JUnit Categories tonight. From what I
remember, these would be a good middle of the road approach, until we get the
changes into arquillian.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 23, 2011, at 16:59, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
I give those surefire issues
34 matches
Mail list logo
