hi @ all, it looks like we have an agreement. i'm going to create the corresponding jira issues. (imo: since we haven't seen objections btw. a discussion about it and it isn't a formal vote, we can start right now.)
regards, gerhard 2011/12/20 Marius Bogoevici <marius.bogoev...@gmail.com> > +1 > > On 2011-12-19, at 2:49 PM, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > > > hi @ all, > > > > fyi: please check [1] before you answer. > > > > [2] provides a short introduction as well as the basic usage. > > > > the basic concept: > > pre-configured cdi artifacts (like implementations of > > javax.enterprise.inject.spi.Extension) which can't be deactivated via > > ProcessAnnotatedType#veto are deactivatable via implementations of > > ClassDeactivator. > > > > please send > > +1, +0 or -1 because... > > for the basic idea as well as the basic concept. > > if there are >basic< objections, please also add them to [3] > > > > regards, > > gerhard > > > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/7yefspfuvtz4jvmp > > [2] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EXTCDI/Core+Config+and+SPI#CoreConfigandSPI-Deactivatingdefaultimplementations > > [3] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/SE+Feature+Ranking > >
