yes - i'm just talking about public branches - local branches are part of
the suggestion.
regards,
gerhard
2012/1/4 Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com
That's not exactly how it would work though, what we want to avoid is merge
commits, so branches are fine, but they need to be fast
hi @ all,
mark added some additional suggestions to the wiki [1].
besides that we have to discuss further topics like:
- file encoding
- line-endings
- usage of special characters
regards,
gerhard
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/Suggested+Git+Workflows
lightguard...@gmail.com
To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: git workflow
Preference here, but -1 for rebase merging. I
hi @ all,
feel free to add your suggestions to [1].
regards,
gerhard
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/Suggested+Git+Workflows
@incubator.apache.org
Cc: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: git workflow
Preference here, but -1 for rebase merging. I personally like seeing where
everything came from.
I get scared when I see people suggesting