Re: [Demexp-dev] Client web.

2005-04-18 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 02:22:16PM +0200, Serge Leblanc wrote: > I started the web client, have a look at : > http://217.128.128.14/demexp-cgi-client.cgi The only thing I have seen is the list of tags. If it is what is intended / what you have developed so far, then congrats. Best regards,

Re: [Demexp-dev] Client web.

2005-04-18 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi again, On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 03:16:36PM +0200, Frederic Lehobey wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 02:22:16PM +0200, Serge Leblanc wrote: > > I started the web client, have a look at : > > http://217.128.128.14/demexp-cgi-client.cgi > > The only thing I have seen is the

[Demexp-dev] Re: [demexp.contact] Re: DEMEXP

2005-04-18 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 08:50:40PM +0200, David MENTRE wrote: > Emanuele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yes, i'm interested in Italian translation from english, where is the > > source? > > I'm not sure I was clear in my last email. I was proposing to you to > translate democratic experie

Re: [Demexp-dev] demexp 0.5.2

2005-07-02 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 10:03:50PM +0200, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 22:44:16 +0200 > David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've just released yet another beta of demexp, v0.5.2. > I've updated the Gentoo overlay for this release. It's still at > the same

[Demexp-dev] Demexp lists usage.

2005-08-01 Thread Frederic Lehobey
d demexp-en a > mailing-list for the broader political project ? Yes, exactly. > I do not provide x86_64 yet. Frederic Lehobey should quite soon provide > PowerPC and SPARC binaries, but no one said that he would provide x86_64 Yes. Let's say end of the week (if debootstrap pro

Re: [Demexp-dev] demexp 0.6 Debian package available

2005-08-01 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:33:07AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > >I use Ubuntu, which is basically debian, so I'm interested BUT > >I have to ask what binaries you're providing? > > I do not yet provide binaries for Ubuntu, but I may do so within next > week, if I find the time to set up

[Demexp-dev] Full disclosure

2005-08-10 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:01:50PM +0200, Felix HENRY wrote: > > [2] Names concealed to keep them in the project. :) > > > I'll stay anyway :-) . > Just can't remember my password. Tried several. > Kind of an aging thing I guess :-) You were not alone in this. :-) (I should always read

Re: [Demexp-dev] Win32 binary for demexp 0.6

2005-08-31 Thread Frederic Lehobey
t; Fatal error: exception Invalid_argument("String.sub") It does not come from the client, but as explained on the demexp-fr list, an invalid tag '*' has been introduced in the database. I think only David can fix that. Thanks for your work on the Windows port. Best regards,

Re: [Demexp-dev] Re: cygwin latex package: tetex

2005-09-01 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 08:53:44AM +0200, David MENTRE wrote: > > It also spams stdout while building files: doc/demexp-book.log is 51K big > > Yep. Latex is particularly verbose but the hyperref package adds a lot > of errors. As it is only messages for developers, I don't mind a lot. > And

Re: [Demexp-dev] Re: cygwin latex package: tetex

2005-09-01 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:13:06PM +0200, David MENTRE wrote: > 2005/9/1, Frederic Lehobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > latex -interaction=batchmode whatever.tex > > Have you any pointer on more information about latex command line > option (what is eaxctly doing -int

Re: [Demexp-dev] Organization of tags

2005-09-10 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 03:24:10PM +1000, skaller wrote: > On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 19:33 +0200, Felix HENRY wrote: > Actually, there is another service that may need discussion .. > > I can't speak a word of French. Most of the questions > and responses are French. There should be some facilit

[Demexp-dev] While hacking with David

2005-09-27 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Two new bugs found in demexp: 1/ Anybody (even anonymous) can change public / private status of the question (this huge hole is understood and practically solved). :) 2/ In the classification window of the client the public / private state change is not taken into account. :( Boring stuff to

Re: [Demexp-dev] *EXPERIMENTAL* web interface for demexp

2005-10-06 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:10:33PM +0200, David MENTRE wrote: > I've implemented a basic web interface to demexp using WDialog. You can > try it at: > http://www.linux-france.org/cgi-bin/demexpweb.cgi > I've not spent much time polishing it. So you'll probably find many bugs > and issues.

Re: [Demexp-dev] Debian packages: new versions

2005-10-21 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 10:52:01AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > Yesterday, I've updated the Debian packages of CDuce (to version 0.3.92) > and CamlGz (to version 0.5.7). I've also recompiled demexp against these > new versions of CDuce and CamlGz (and changed the 'latex' dependency to >

Re: [Demexp-dev] Inclusion of ocaml-gettext in build infrastructure

2006-01-22 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 11:14:30PM +0100, David MENTRE wrote: > I have included ocaml-gettext in the configure, Makefile and Co. The > code is now in the latest 0.7 dev tree. I haven't done anything to the > client code, except adding an "f_" call into > gtk2-clnt/demexp-gtk2-client.ml.nw for

Re: [demexp-fr] Re: [Demexp-dev] Inclusion of ocaml-gettext in build infrastructure

2006-01-25 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 07:08:13PM +0100, David MENTRE wrote: > David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > BTW, which editor have you used to edit the PO file? > > You still haven't answered. ;) Quick answer (sorry) is poedit. :-) Frederic _

[Demexp-dev] Re: Next SCM for > 0.8 releases

2006-01-26 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 05:05:12PM +0100, David MENTRE wrote: > In fact, svk is very interesting: it keeps compatibility with > What is the current version of SVK in sid? 1.05? 1.06? (I can't check 1.06 (PTS is not down though): http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/svk.html > Would it be doable

Re: [Demexp-dev] Re: OpenLazlo: another framework for development of web applications

2006-05-23 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 06:20:15PM +0200, David MENTRE wrote: > - I'm not sure OpenLazlo is really free. It's licence: > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/cpl.php Unsettled for Debian (DFSG): http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses?#head-18b757589ce27dc3f556ed9e91fb2e4cd499a7a9 Experimentally,

Re: ONC RPC for PHP? Re: [Demexp-dev] On web client, XML and ONC RPC and their integration with demexp

2006-09-01 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 12:44:37PM +0800, Augustin wrote: > For the sake of argument, what if leaving the server as is (using ONC RPC) > and > creating a library coded in PHP (I cannot help with anything else) IS the > best technical and tactical choice? > How hard could that be? > Well,

Re: demexp.org Re: [Demexp-dev] Theme questions

2006-09-09 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:10:27PM +0800, Augustin wrote: > About demexp.org, it is of course my understanding that as soon as the module > I'm working on is stable enough, Drupal will be install on demexp.org, where > spip used to be. Well. Unfortunately it is not that simple. The current

Re: [Demexp-dev] tag classification and hierachy

2006-09-10 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 06:23:42PM +0800, Augustin wrote: > I was under the impression that there was a tree-like hierarchy of tags. Yes and no. Actually there is not really. But some is simulated for readability of tags with the `aad:' `zc:'" part of the tag names. It has effects only on th

Re: [Demexp-dev] tag classification and hierachy

2006-09-10 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 06:59:02PM +0800, Augustin wrote: > On Sunday 10 September 2006 06:34 pm, Frederic Lehobey wrote: > > > I was under the impression that there was a tree-like hierarchy of tags. > > > > Yes and no. Actually there is not really. But some is simul

Re: [Demexp-dev] Swedish party to use demexp?

2006-10-02 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, David has already said it all. On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 02:07:57PM +0200, ketty . wrote: > Hello, i have recently engaged myself in a swedish party which strives for > directdemocracy in sweden. Website in swedish: > http://www.aktivdemokrati.se/Manifesto in english: > http://wse75376.web16.ta

Re: [Demexp-dev] demexp 0.8.0 is out!!

2006-10-02 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 04:30:43PM +0200, David MENTRE wrote: > I'm pleased to announce the availability of demexp 0.8.0: > http://www.linux-france.org/~dmentre/demexp/latest-src/demexp-0.8.0.tar.gz > I'm not so sure it is a "stable" release, but at least it is out! Would you apply for thi

Re: [Demexp-dev] demexp 0.8.0 is out!!

2006-10-02 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:23:28PM +0200, Frederic Lehobey wrote: > On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 04:30:43PM +0200, David MENTRE wrote: > > > I'm pleased to announce the availability of demexp 0.8.0: > > http://www.linux-france.org/~dmentre/demexp/latest-src/demexp-0.8.0.t

Re: [Demexp-dev] demexp 0.8.0 is out!!

2006-10-02 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:48:24PM +0200, David MENTRE wrote: > 2006/10/2, Frederic Lehobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > - Applications for Public infrastructures and for communities for > >the demexp server (I believe the application should be carried by > >David) &g

Re: [Demexp-dev] TOP invitation to programmers.

2006-10-02 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 05:34:40PM +0200, ketty . wrote: > I have been made aware of the TOP Politics -group: > http://top.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/Main/ > And a recent post to unite programmers: > http://groups.google.com/group/top-politics/browse_frm/thread/505c11b28d85cbf7/c30b4ae282e4fbde#

Re: [Demexp-dev] TOP invitation to programmers.

2006-10-02 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, You replied to me only (a mistake?), but I keep demexp-dev in Cc:. Hope you do not mind. On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 08:06:39PM +0200, ketty . wrote: > On 10/2/06, Frederic Lehobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >It is correct the current voting method is Condorcet (and

Re: "Trophées du libre " applicatio n (was: Re: [Demexp-dev] demexp 0.8.0 is out!!)

2006-10-04 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 07:52:19PM +0800, Augustin wrote: > On Tuesday 03 October 2006 04:10 am, David MENTRE wrote: > > Ok, I have applied in Public Services category. The submission form is > > quite strange, you should give an URL of the project, but I don't know > > exactly which one. If t

Re: [Demexp-dev] demexp 0.8.0 is out!!

2006-10-04 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 10:52:29PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > The Debian package for Sid is available for my repository [1]. Packages > Just to give an idea of the problem: ... > Add to this: ... > So, besides demexp, I had to produce packages for ocaml-gettext, > ocaml-ast-analyze

Re: [Demexp-dev] Updated installer for 0.8.0 and diff

2006-10-04 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:34:12PM +0200, GISQUET Christophe wrote: > This patch against repository (>= 0.8.0) updates the installer so that: > The setup was updated accordingly: > http://christophe.gisquet.free.fr/demexp/demexp-0.8.0.exe Much thanks too. Windows and Debian (sid) the same da

Re: [Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-13 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:48:53PM +0200, ketty . wrote: > On 10/13/06, David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I have uploaded a new version encoded in UTF-8. Let me know if I have > >break something. > > > I am still not able to use »« in the sources without breaking the book. It > s

[Demexp-dev] One single account please

2006-10-16 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 03:54:47PM +0200, Felix HENRY wrote: > I understand there are technical issues to the problem of logins, however, I > am concerned with the complexity of it from the point of view of the user. > Once again, the whole point of having a web client is to make it easier fo

Re: [Demexp-dev] Re: How to handle protocol modifications. Delegation.

2006-10-16 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 07:03:45PM +0200, ketty wrote: > On 10/16/06, David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, I've seen that you(?) have made an interesting proposal: "Do not > >delegate on voting server, just publish public positions". I like it > >because it would simplify both the s

[Demexp-dev] Javascript

2006-10-17 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 11:11:27PM +0200, ketty wrote: > On 10/17/06, David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Emmm. You really need Javascript? I thought that WDialog was working > >without the need for Javascript? > Most parts of wdialog works without javascript. But not all. (You did

Re: [Demexp-dev] Annoying bug in 0.8.2

2006-10-22 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 09:21:48PM +0200, David MENTRE wrote: > Of course, just after releasing 0.8.2, I found an annoying bug in this > release: all questions are marked "unseen" after an upgrade. I fixed it > in my Mercurial tree[1]. > > If anybody wants to package the latest release, let

Re: [Demexp-dev] Re: Some questions on Drupal's demexp module setup

2006-10-30 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:46:03PM +0800, Augustin wrote: > On Monday 30 October 2006 04:26 am, David MENTRE wrote: > > But I also would like to understand how your Drupal module is working. > > I am very happy that my code will get a proper review, but don't let this > delay the release of

Re: [Demexp-dev] Re: Some questions on Drupal's demexp module setup

2006-10-31 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Augustin, On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:21:09PM +0800, Augustin wrote: > I hope you will one day become more trustful. > > It is a pain to work in such an atmosphere of mistrust. Maybe David is uneasy about expressing precisely his own feelings in English (French might help), but please have it cl

Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation

2007-01-15 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:15:08AM +0100, Jeremy Dubreil wrote: > In some cases this might lead to something we would wish to avoid. > Indeed, if a voter A tries to delegate the question Q to the other > participants then he can infer who is on a path of delegation to him. > And in the sam

Re: [Demexp-dev] A simple path for delegation

2007-01-15 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 03:41:01PM +0100, Felix HENRY wrote: > I make here another proposal to simplify things (this would be a big change > as compared to > our previous plans) "If you accept to be a delegate on a certain > subject/question, > then you are not allowed to delegate this questi

Re: [Demexp-dev] 0.5 step closer to OCaml Summer of Code

2007-02-07 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 01:44:57PM +0100, ketty wrote: > Hi, thank you for your many comments, i have lots to think about ^^ Thanks for your efforts. > >> • Deletion of questions (and tags..)? > > > >Same as above, the questions and tags cannot be removed (questions can > >only be hidden). >

Re: [Demexp-dev] 0.5 step closer to OCaml Summer of Code

2007-02-07 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 02:24:53PM +0100, ketty wrote: > On 2/7/07, Frederic Lehobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Well, it is somewhat a feature. We have not designed nor implemented > >ways to hide or rewrite history. :-) > > I'm thinking of it more like a

Re: [Demexp-dev] 0.5 step closer to OCaml Summer of Code

2007-02-07 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 03:00:55PM +0100, ketty wrote: > On 2/7/07, Frederic Lehobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I am not sure I see what you mean. (Hide tags? What for? Mmmm. For the > >interface, maybe... but it could be a different mechanism specific to > >the

Re: [Demexp-dev] Joyfully marching towards OCaml Summer and running strainght into the Big Wall of Fear

2007-02-12 Thread Frederic Lehobey
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 08:25:54PM +0100, ketty wrote: > I have bad news about ocaml summer. i am suddenly very scared by it. > with all that said i still don't want to abandon demexp, and i feel > really bad about freaking out. i guess the only way to clear my > concience is to do really much dem

[Demexp-dev] Next summer(s) of code...

2007-03-08 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, I am sorry I am so late in the game to raise this idea. But I think it would be a major improvement to add OpenID support to demexp (a 'must have'). Anyone with more ideas and interest? http://openid.net/ http://iwantmyopenid.org/ Experimentally, Frédéric _

Re: [Demexp-dev] Fwd: Reason of refusal for our GSoC application (demexp)?

2007-03-21 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:11:34AM +0100, David MENTRE wrote: > The response of Google people. Not being reviewed is linked to > "little" details. :-( > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Google Summer of Code Program Admin Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 20 mars 2007 22:19 > S

Re: [Demexp-dev] [FIX] A classification bug that crashes the client

2007-03-26 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 10:00:06AM +0200, David MENTRE wrote: > In the meantime, Félix or Fred, could you change the classification so > that tag with id 89 (I think it is "faa: La Poste") has a different > classification level that another tag at the same level ("faa:", I > think it is somet