[Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-12 Thread ketty .
On 10/12/06, David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Ketty,I've started to look at how I could merge your branch to integrate yourmodifications to demexpweb. Before doing the merge, I have some remarks(by order of decreasing importance): 1. why do you create a web/po/ directory instead of usi

[Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-12 Thread David MENTRE
Hi Ketty, 2006/10/12, ketty . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 10/12/06, David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. why do you create a web/po/ directory instead of using po/ > directory? I don't like spreading po files all over the > sources. Moreover, you have created web/po/Makefile. Once ag

[Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-13 Thread ketty .
On 10/13/06, David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't think so, or at least not easily. I understand it is a bitcumbersome to look for only the strings of your web interface in thewhole po file but it makes the whole source tree and build system alot cleaner, I think. I have hacked together

[Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-13 Thread David MENTRE
Hi Ketty, "ketty ." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have hacked together something that seems to work. Please tell me what you > think: http://equah.afraid.org/demexp/hg/main?cs=d7004008e5db At first sight, that seems pretty nice. I noticed that you have removed the dependency to avoid the buil

[Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-13 Thread ketty .
Hello,On 10/13/06, David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Could you try following tree (your tree with some fixes to be able to doa 'make all'):  http://www.linux-france.org/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/demexp/ketty-dm If that works, I'll merge it with mine.It works fine for me. :)(Well, minus the fact th

[Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-13 Thread David MENTRE
"ketty ." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It works fine for me. :) Great. I've merged your branch. :-) > (Well, minus the fact that the server still don't compile out of the box on > amd64) Yes. A clean fix (Caml_int CDuce type) is available in latest CDuce release (0.4.1 IIRC). As soon as Thomas

[Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-13 Thread ketty .
On 10/13/06, David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Do you know a simple way to determine if a file is encoded into latin1or unicode ('file' only provides encoding for text files)?Try "file --mime". ___ Demexp-dev mailing list Demexp-dev@nongnu.org http

[Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-13 Thread David MENTRE
"ketty ." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Try "file --mime". Thanks, it works. I have uploaded a new version encoded in UTF-8. Let me know if I have break something. Best wishes, d. -- GPG/PGP key: A3AD7A2A David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5996 CC46 4612 9CA4 3562 D7AC 6C67 9E96 A3AD 7A2A __

[Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-13 Thread ketty .
On 10/13/06, David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have uploaded a new version encoded in UTF-8. Let me know if I havebreak something.I am still not able to use »« in the sources without breaking the book. It seams to me like latex has some serious issues[1] :( [1] Recent debian thread: http://

Re: [Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-13 Thread Frederic Lehobey
Hi, On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:48:53PM +0200, ketty . wrote: > On 10/13/06, David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I have uploaded a new version encoded in UTF-8. Let me know if I have > >break something. > > > I am still not able to use »« in the sources without breaking the book. It > s

Re: [Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-14 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Hi ! Le Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:45:53 +0200, David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Yes. A clean fix (Caml_int CDuce type) is available in latest CDuce > release (0.4.1 IIRC). As soon as Thomas updates his Debian package of > cduce, I'll use that type and that should work out of the box on > AM

Re: [Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-14 Thread David MENTRE
Hi all, Frederic Lehobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:48:53PM +0200, ketty . wrote: >> On 10/13/06, David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I am still not able to use »« in the sources without breaking the book. It >> seams to me like latex has some serious issues[1

Re: [Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-14 Thread David MENTRE
Hi Thomas, Thomas Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > cduce 0.4.1 is available in Debian unstable since 9 days, and will > migrate to testing tomorrow. Many thanks. However (sorry Thomas) I'm still in Debian Sarge (and fear than an upgrade will break my ADSL modem): any chance to have it in

Re: [Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-14 Thread ketty .
On 10/14/06, David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But in fact, it does not work for other random UTF-8 chars, like: ¶ŋĸłµ¢"So you've been warned, this is a temporary fix. For other unicodecharacters, one must load specific Unicode table but I don't know how to do that.Maybe xetex[1] might be a n

Re: [Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-15 Thread David MENTRE
"ketty ." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maybe xetex[1] might be a non-temporary fix? I don't know. I'd rather avoid another experimental dependency in demexp. We will see if unicode is a issue or not. Best wishes, d. -- GPG/PGP key: A3AD7A2A David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5996 CC46 4612 9CA4

Re: [Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-15 Thread David MENTRE
Hi Thomas, David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However (sorry Thomas) I'm still in Debian Sarge (and fear than an > upgrade will break my ADSL modem): any chance to have it in your sarge > repository or is it too complicated (i.e. more than just a make in the > right directory)? Can I reco

Re: [Demexp-dev] Re: Before merging ketty's branch

2006-10-15 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Hi, Le Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:47:51 +0200, David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Well, after some thought, don't bother: I'll have to switch to Etch > anyway. Too late: your dreams became true. I've just uploaded cduce 0.4.1 for Debian Sarge ;-) (It was easy, only took 10 minutes). Sincerl