On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:41:47PM +0100, David MENTRE wrote:
Hello,
2005/12/6, Thomas Petazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe David Mentré (the demexp developer) will give his motivations
behind the choice of camlgz instead of camlzip.
camlgz provides in-memory zipping and unzipping while
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 03:13:39PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:41:47PM +0100, David MENTRE wrote:
Hello,
2005/12/6, Thomas Petazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe David Mentr (the demexp developer) will give his motivations
behind the choice of camlgz instead of
Hi,
Sven Luther wrote:
I am curious, how does camlgz compare with camlzip ?
Eric Cooper said on July, 29th:
« I'd like to see this in Debian so I can use it in approx. Right now I
am forking gunzip/bunzip2 processes with Sys.command (and that's still
faster than using Camlzip). »
On my
Hello,
2005/12/6, Thomas Petazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe David Mentré (the demexp developer) will give his motivations
behind the choice of camlgz instead of camlzip.
camlgz provides in-memory zipping and unzipping while camlzip only
provides zipping and unzipping from files.
Yours,
d.
