Good evening,
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, David MENTRE wrote:
I don't think so. It is a developer document.
Fine.
going to try something ?
Sorry no. I just integrated you document in my Arch tree.
No problem. You are already the main developper. And developpers are
rarely the packagers.
--
Ch
GISQUET Christophe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK. Is there any need for the file to be added to the installer ?
I don't think so. It is a developer document.
> btw, I guess you recently read the howto to make such a comment. Are you
> going to try something ?
Sorry no. I just integrated you
Good evening David and list
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, David MENTRE wrote:
the doc files. Could you check whether they look OK to you? Same place,
files demexp-book.{dvi,pdf}
The PDF looks right. Very nice! \o/
OK. Is there any need for the file to be added to the installer ?
It also spams stdout
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:13:06PM +0200, David MENTRE wrote:
> 2005/9/1, Frederic Lehobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > latex -interaction=batchmode whatever.tex
>
> Have you any pointer on more information about latex command line
> option (what is eaxctly doing -interaction=batchmode)? I'm unab
Fred,
2005/9/1, Frederic Lehobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> latex -interaction=batchmode whatever.tex
Have you any pointer on more information about latex command line
option (what is eaxctly doing -interaction=batchmode)? I'm unable to
find any documentation, either localy or through google.
Yours,
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 08:53:44AM +0200, David MENTRE wrote:
> > It also spams stdout while building files: doc/demexp-book.log is 51K big
>
> Yep. Latex is particularly verbose but the hyperref package adds a lot
> of errors. As it is only messages for developers, I don't mind a lot.
> And
Hello Christophe,
2005/9/1, GISQUET Christophe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So I installed all of those, ran almost out of space but manage to build
> the doc files. Could you check whether they look OK to you? Same place,
> files demexp-book.{dvi,pdf}
The PDF looks right. Very nice! \o/
> It also spa
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, David MENTRE wrote:
You say in your howto:
Fails at latex (don't know the cygwin package)
This is a remnant of the older howto. --no-dvi removes this problem. I've
updated the howto to reflect this.
The cygwin package of latex is tetex.
Well, it seems all tetex* pa
