Re: [Denemo-devel] The release branch

2010-10-19 Thread Jeremiah Benham
On Oct 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Nils Gey wrote: When I do these steps on my git... make clean fails because of no target. There is nothing to clean anyway. ./autogen.sh or sh autogen.sh [n...@fyps denemo]$ ./autogen.sh libtoolize: putting auxiliary files in `.'. libtoolize: linking file `./

Re: [Denemo-devel] The release branch

2010-10-19 Thread Nils Gey
When I do these steps on my git... make clean fails because of no target. There is nothing to clean anyway. ./autogen.sh or sh autogen.sh [n...@fyps denemo]$ ./autogen.sh libtoolize: putting auxiliary files in `.'. libtoolize: linking file `./ltmain.sh' libtoolize: putting macros in AC_CONFIG_MA

Re: [Denemo-devel] Breve and Denemo's understanding of durations greater than whole note.

2010-10-19 Thread Richard Shann
I will fix whole measure rests (and likely multi-measure rests) which are broken by the new semantics of chord-prefix. Richard On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 20:07 +0200, Nils Gey wrote: > A whole new branch of scripting options came up because of this. > > Nils __

Re: [Denemo-devel] Breve and Denemo's understanding of durations greater than whole note.

2010-10-19 Thread Richard Shann
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 20:07 +0200, Nils Gey wrote: > Except that all normal Denemo notes get a whole-note shape afterwards. > If we think of doing tuplets with SetDurationInTicks this could be > confusing :) There is an important conceptual misunderstanding hiding here: d-SetDurationInTicks applie