It all looks good, I've revised the comment about the 1.03 windows
binary.
With all the code tidying now in master we should allow a fair amount of
testing time to 1.04 I think.
Richard
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 15:52 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> I made the release announcements on facebook, LAU,
I made the release announcements on facebook, LAU, and LAA. I also updated
the website to use the correct links to the binaries (They are not
appearing on gnu.org for some reason. They are probably blocking it because
of the file size and the fact that they are binaries. I don't know). The
binaries
I uploaded the tarball and the binaries but I only see the tarball on the
ftp servers. Maybe it takes a while. Oh well. We can store some binaries on
denemo.org then.
Jeremiah
On May 12, 2013 8:20 AM, "Jeremiah Benham"
wrote:
> I will do that tonight.
>
> Jeremiah
> On May 12, 2013 6:01 AM, "Ric
I will do that tonight.
Jeremiah
On May 12, 2013 6:01 AM, "Richard Shann" wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 20:47 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
> >
> > 2013/5/7 Richard Shann
> > I have tested the
> > http://denemo.org/downloads/denemo-1.0.2.tar.gz and it
> > builds and exec
On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 20:47 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
>
> 2013/5/7 Richard Shann
> I have tested the
> http://denemo.org/downloads/denemo-1.0.2.tar.gz and it
> builds and executes - it defaults to expecting lilypond to be
> installed
> along with denemo
2013/5/7 Richard Shann
> I have tested the http://denemo.org/downloads/denemo-1.0.2.tar.gz and it
> builds and executes - it defaults to expecting lilypond to be installed
> along with denemo, which is won't be the case if someone is building
> from the tarball, usually. I don't think we should h
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 10:18 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> I have just uploaded the mingw version.
I have downloaded and tested this version for sanity - seems to be
working just fine.
> I have to rebuild the darwin version to get the updates to the 1.0.2 branch
> yet. It seems to work in wine.
I have just uploaded the mingw version. I have to rebuild the darwin version to
get the updates to the 1.0.2 branch yet. It seems to work in wine.
Jeremiah
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 12:06:20PM -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> Is it safe to create the 1.0.2 tarball yet? I created a Mac Os X binary
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 09:11 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 21:36 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> > On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 05:55:00PM +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> > > I have updated stable-1.0.2 to have the missing files and the
> > > translations that have come in for this re
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 21:36 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 05:55:00PM +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> > I have updated stable-1.0.2 to have the missing files and the
> > translations that have come in for this release.
> > Can you create a tarball and binaries from this branc
On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 05:55:00PM +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> I have updated stable-1.0.2 to have the missing files and the
> translations that have come in for this release.
> Can you create a tarball and binaries from this branch now for final
> sanity check?
I uploaded the tarball to denemo.
I have updated stable-1.0.2 to have the missing files and the
translations that have come in for this release.
Can you create a tarball and binaries from this branch now for final
sanity check?
Richard
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 12:06 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> Is it safe to create the 1.0.2 ta
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 12:06 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> Is it safe to create the 1.0.2 tarball yet?
Well, we are awaiting translations, I know that Federico Bruni was
intending to finish - perhaps his translation is awaiting approval from
the Italian team.
> I created a Mac Os X binary that n
please wait for the italian translation!
I'm still waiting for revision from the italian team, but I'll send the po
to the translation project tomorrow and I'll include corrections in a
future release
2013/5/3 Jeremiah Benham
> Is it safe to create the 1.0.2 tarball yet? I created a Mac Os X bi
Is it safe to create the 1.0.2 tarball yet? I created a Mac Os X binary that
needs testing here:
http://denemo.org/downloads/denemo-1.0.2-0.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
I had to make these attached changes to po/POTFILES.in to allow make dist to
succeed. Are these changes ok?
Jeremiah
diff --git a/po/POT
15 matches
Mail list logo
