Re: Refactoring (for merge) and APIs

2004-06-22 Thread Michael Davey
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: 1) Resource -> Artifact: It will not be trivial, but we could rename Resource to be Artifact to ease a merge with Avalon Repository (and since Artifact has started to become a recognized term). +1. Shouldn't be to difficult using IDEA. I'd be happy to do the work if th

[GUMP@brutus]: depot/depot-update-test failed

2004-06-22 Thread Adam Jack
public/workspace/depot/update] CLASSPATH : /usr/local/j2sdk1.4.2_04/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/depot/update/build/depot-update/junit/classes:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/depot/update/dist/depot-update-gump-20040622.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist/lib/ant-styleb

[GUMP@brutus]: depot/depot-update success

2004-06-22 Thread Adam Jack
etails are available at: http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/depot/depot-update/index.html That said, some snippets follow: The following annotations were provided: -DEBUG- Sole jar [depot-update-gump-20040622.jar] identifier set to project name -INFO- Dependency on ant exists, no need

Re: Reviewing Avalon & Depot Code bases

2004-06-22 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Thanks, and no stress (I need to find some time for family/EMT school/work/Gump, so I'll appreciate discussions not being too busy.) Also, maybe I can find some time to put Depot's house in order prior to a merge. Thanks for the impetus... regards Adam - Original Message - From: "Niclas

Refactoring (for merge) and APIs

2004-06-22 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
1) Resource -> Artifact: It will not be trivial, but we could rename Resource to be Artifact to ease a merge with Avalon Repository (and since Artifact has started to become a recognized term). BTW: I've started to create a page for terms (as Nick suggested): http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/

Re: Reviewing Avalon & Depot Code bases

2004-06-22 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 23:14, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > I did a quick review (and I say quick, so please correct me where I am > wrong). This is what I found: Just want to give you the nod, that I am happy to see your effort, and at large concur with your assessment. I will comment more in detail

Reviewing Avalon & Depot Code bases

2004-06-22 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
All, I did a quick review (and I say quick, so please correct me where I am wrong). This is what I found: The Avalon codebase is simple -- and that is a major plus, no clutter, no fuss. The approach is nicely broken into separate source directories (which helps illustrate the separations) such as

Re: classloader was: Moving forward or letting go

2004-06-22 Thread Nick Chalko
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Monday 21 June 2004 13:04, Nick Chalko wrote: ... Classloading is a real problem in java, and an important one to tackle but I prefer to keep the scope of Depot limited. Other project's like Avalon can tackle the classloaders. Perhaps we can take

Re: classloader was: Moving forward or letting go

2004-06-22 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 05:49, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > I get it. > > In essence, a single Avalon system needs to load different artifacts in > separate classloaders during the same run. Yes, it is not a Build time concern, but builds include the running of tests, and some of these tests are f

[GUMP@brutus]: depot/depot-update-test failed

2004-06-22 Thread Adam Jack
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project depot-update-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Project State : '