Re: INTERSECT and EXCEPT Design

2005-02-28 Thread Jean T. Anderson
Jack Klebanoff wrote: RPost wrote: ... Anyway, I think you meant to compare UNION (or UNION ALL) and INTERSECT here (as you did EXCEPT/INTERSECT below this) to illustrate the higher precedence of INTERSECT. Yes. I included the UNION/UNION ALL example because it is important to get the associa

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-155) Add DISTINCT keyword support to INTERSECT and EXCEPT

2005-02-28 Thread Jeremy Boynes (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-155?page=history ] Jeremy Boynes resolved DERBY-155: - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version: 10.1.0.0 Sendingjava\engine\org\apache\derby\impl\sql\compile\sqlgrammar.jj Sending java\testing\o

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-147) ERROR 42X79 not consistant ? - same column name specified twice

2005-02-28 Thread Army
Hi, Don't know why the system was coded to throw exception for duplicate columns but it seems like it has been around in Cloudscape from very beginning. I only looked at this briefly, so please don't take this as the final word or anything--but here's one reason why we might want to throw an erro

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-147) ERROR 42X79 not consistant ? - same column name specified twice

2005-02-28 Thread Mamta Satoor
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:57:59 +0100 (CET), Bernd Ruehlicke (JIRA) wrote: > [ > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-147?page=comments#action_59875 ] > > Bernd Ruehlicke commented on DERBY-147: > --- > > Ok I made the changes and build Derby - and tes

[jira] Assigned: (DERBY-155) Add DISTINCT keyword support to INTERSECT and EXCEPT

2005-02-28 Thread Jeremy Boynes (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-155?page=history ] Jeremy Boynes reassigned DERBY-155: --- Assign To: Jeremy Boynes > Add DISTINCT keyword support to INTERSECT and EXCEPT > > > Key

Re: Overly conservative on reserved words?

2005-02-28 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Daniel John Debrunner wrote: Jeremy Boynes wrote: Reserving additional words from the second group poses a bigger issue as users' may have databases out there already using these words as identifiers. The smoothest path is probably to give people an indication of which words will need to be reserv

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-152) ERROR 42X01: Syntax error: Encountered "commit" at line 1, column 1.

2005-02-28 Thread Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-152?page=history ] Daniel John Debrunner updated DERBY-152: type: Wish (was: Bug) > ERROR 42X01: Syntax error: Encountered "commit" at line 1, column 1. > -

Re: Overly conservative on reserved words?

2005-02-28 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Jeremy Boynes wrote: > > Reserving additional words from the second group poses a bigger issue as > users' may have databases out there already using these words as > identifiers. The smoothest path is probably to give people an indication > of which words will need to be reserved at some point a

Re: [VOTE][PATCH]updates on forward only resultset using JDBC 2.0 UpdatableResultset APIs

2005-02-28 Thread Mamta Satoor
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:58:36 -0800, Mamta Satoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have addressed the comments made by Dan for performance. Here is the > new patch. Let me know what you all think. > > The comments made by Dan can be found in following thread > http://mail-archives.eu.apache.

Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-31) Statement.setQueryTimeout() support.

2005-02-28 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Shreyas Kaushik wrote: > Please see below for my replies. > > ~ Shreyas > > Daniel John Debrunner wrote: >> I think a detailed explanation of what you believe cancel and >> setQueryTimeout functionality should be would be very useful. I'm not >> sure closing the activation actually results in th

Re: [PATCH] BackingStoreHashtable

2005-02-28 Thread Mike Matrigali
Any idea if many more queries will now spill to disk? I am worried that many more will, and now queries will run slower. Seems like there should be a better connection between the optimizer estimate to use in memory hash and what actually is done in memory. As I understand it now the Optimizer

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-147) ERROR 42X79 not consistant ? - same column name specified twice

2005-02-28 Thread Bernd Ruehlicke (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-147?page=comments#action_59875 ] Bernd Ruehlicke commented on DERBY-147: --- Ok I made the changes and build Derby - and tested it - seams to work. We may consider to make this change permanent. Any rea

[jira] Created: (DERBY-155) Add DISTINCT keyword support to INTERSECT and EXCEPT

2005-02-28 Thread Jeremy Boynes (JIRA)
Add DISTINCT keyword support to INTERSECT and EXCEPT Key: DERBY-155 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-155 Project: Derby Type: Improvement Components: SQL Versions: 10.1.0.0 Reporter:

Re: INTERSECT and EXCEPT Design

2005-02-28 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Jack Klebanoff wrote: RPost wrote: >Jack Klebanoff wrote: >The syntax is (roughly): />queryExpression/ INTERSECT [ALL] /queryExpression/ />queryExpression/ EXCEPT [ALL] /queryExpression/ Although DISTINCT is implicit if ALL is not specified the SQL standard also allows the DISTINCT operator to

Re: INTERSECT and EXCEPT Design

2005-02-28 Thread Jack Klebanoff
RPost wrote: >Jack Klebanoff wrote: >The syntax is (roughly): />queryExpression/ INTERSECT [ALL] /queryExpression/ />queryExpression/ EXCEPT [ALL] /queryExpression/ Although DISTINCT is implicit if ALL is not specified the SQL standard also allows the DISTINCT operator to be specified explicitl

[Announce] Jeremy Boynes joins Derby PPMC

2005-02-28 Thread Jean T. Anderson
I'm pleased to announce that Jeremy Boynes has joined the Derby PPMC. regards, -jean