[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-23?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-23:
Attachment: DERBY-23-with_comments.diff
Attached patch with comments where appropriate.
just booting jdbc driver and shutting down seem to leak memory
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-504?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen reopened DERBY-504:
--
Reopen the bug so the fix can be included in 10.1.2. Since the bug was reported
on derby-user before 10.1.1 was released, I think it should be
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-504?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-504:
-
Fix Version: 10.1.2.0
(was: 10.2.0.0)
Version: 10.1.2.0
(was: 10.2.0.0)
Changed fix version.
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Francois Orsini wrote:
Nightly builds should only be posted if regression tests have passed IMHO.
I disagree, a nightly build is use at your own risk. Even if one test
fails the jar may still work and allow anyone to test other areas.
I think the nightly
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-577?page=comments#action_12329982 ]
Thomas Lecavelier commented on DERBY-577:
-
Hi Suresh,
I follow the references about userDirName, it appears it's build from
System.getProperties() and I see nowhere
Query timeout set for one statement may affect other statements with the same
SQL string
Key: DERBY-579
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-579
Project: Derby
Type:
Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-504?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-504:
-
Fix Version: 10.1.2.0
(was: 10.2.0.0)
Version: 10.1.2.0
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-579?page=all ]
Oyvind Bakksjo updated DERBY-579:
-
Attachment: DERBY-579.svn.status
Query timeout set for one statement may affect other statements with the same
SQL string
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-579?page=all ]
Oyvind Bakksjo updated DERBY-579:
-
Attachment: DERBY-579.svn.diff
This patch fixes the bug as proposed by Dan Debrunner (pass the timeout into
the execute method of
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-574?page=all ]
Oyvind Bakksjo closed DERBY-574:
Fix Version: (was: 10.2.0.0)
Resolution: Duplicate
Per JDBC connection timeouts are incorrectly set on
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-504?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-504:
-
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
SELECT DISTINCT returns duplicates when selecting from subselects
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-428?page=comments#action_12330002 ]
Gregory W. Inns commented on DERBY-428:
---
We're getting one similar to this one, but only sporadically.
Does anyone know a workaround for it?
NetworkClient
Kathey, I checked with network server trace on and for the URLs below,
the server does not reach till ACCRDB response to send a RDBAFLRM.
* 'jdbc:derby://localhost:1527/sample:create=true'
* 'jdbc:derby://localhost:1527/C:/myDBs/sample;create=true'
These URLs cause a NullPointerException in the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-573?page=comments#action_12330020 ]
Satheesh Bandaram commented on DERBY-573:
-
It should be possible to enhance current Derby RunTimeStatistics mechanism to
display user specified optimizer directives
Deepa Remesh wrote:
I am using RDBAFLRM for failure to find a suitable driver. Is this
okay or is there any specific message type that must be used in such a
case?
I think that is the best we can do from the server side as we cannot
send a full SQLCARD in this case.
I am not sure what
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-573?page=comments#action_12330031 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-573:
---
I can look into modifying the RunTimeStatistics to indicate that user overrides
are being used. Also, I will see how parser can
There are now three cloning proposals for handling shared code:
1) Hand cloning by the developer as is done today.
2) Build-time cloning.
3) Release-time cloning (David's latest proposal).
All of these cloning approaches address Dan's problem case: a client and
server at diffferent rev
Modify SQL to skip N rows of the result and return the next M rows
--
Key: DERBY-581
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-581
Project: Derby
Type: New Feature
Components: Unknown
This issue is moving forward on a geologic time scale. Far enough
forward that I have been asked: who can champion this issue in other
(that is, not Sun) companies? Can one of the IBM folks find an IBM
champion for this issue?
Thanks,
-Rick
---BeginMessage---
Rick,
Rick the working group
Hi,
Attached is a patch that adds 3 jdk15 canons to the DerbyNet dir for the 10.0 branch.
The change is in essence the same as for commit 149488 to the main branch, but
2of the3 tests are a little different, so a backport will be a little awkward.
If someone can add this to the 10.0 branch?
On 9/20/05, Myrna van Lunteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a patch that adds 3 jdk15 canons to the DerbyNet dir for the
10.0 branch.
Committed revision 290576.
andrew
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-566?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-566:
--
Fix Version: 10.1.1.1
(was: 10.1.2.0)
(was: 10.1.1.0)
Version: 10.1.1.0
Doc bug for saving ij output to a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-566?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-566:
--
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
10.1.2.0
Doc bug for saving ij output to a file
--
Key: DERBY-566
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-149?page=comments#action_12330055 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-149:
--
Looking at this problem, I see that other types of errors, such as insert of a
null value into a not null column seem to work ok.
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
Hmm, this would be my fault. The version should have been bumped after
each release and I neglected to do that immediately after the last
release. Also, I merged the issues with 10.1.1.1 FixIns to 10.1.2.0.
While that was a probably a good idea, in order to target
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-562?page=all ]
Sunitha Kambhampati updated DERBY-562:
--
Attachment: Derby562.stat.txt
Derby incorrectly throws Exception when streaming to BLOB field
David W. Van Couvering wrote:
This proposal was based on the assumption that our common code would
*never* be exposed to the outside world.
I also never claimed that we should apply this solution to third-party
components. That's a fish I don't think we need to fry right now.
Although I
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Think of the carnage if it was java_14208_b13.sql_300.Connection
It's actually instructive to look how Java solves this:
- The interface is kept upwards compatible, by following rules such as
only new methods/fields etc.
Then to look at
Thanks for writing up a proposed solution, I was getting a little tired
of putting up targets for others to shoot down.
I agree with this wholeheartedly this was what I have wanted to do
(although perhaps not as well communicated and there are some details
here that are new and which seem
29 matches
Mail list logo