[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1445?page=all ]
V.Narayanan updated DERBY-1445:
---
Attachment: ver3-washed-v1.diff
ver3-washed-v1.stat
Hi,
thanx a ton for the commit. Please find attached the follow-up patch with the
comments
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1417?page=all ]
Kristian Waagan updated DERBY-1417:
---
Attachment: derby-1417-1a-notImplemented.diff
derby-1417-1a-notImplemented.stat
'derby-1417-1a-notImplemented.diff' adds a number of new
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1417?page=all ]
Kristian Waagan updated DERBY-1417:
---
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
Add new, lengthless overloads to the streaming api
--
Key:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1445?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen resolved DERBY-1445:
---
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks! Committed the follow-up patch into trunk with revision 417705.
Add new streaming
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1043?page=all ]
Fernanda Pizzorno updated DERBY-1043:
-
Attachment: derby-1043.diff
derby-1043.stat
I tried a similar update statement as the one in the trigger to see if the
problem was
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1043?page=all ]
Fernanda Pizzorno updated DERBY-1043:
-
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
Invalid column references are not caught in a trigger action statement when
the referencing table of the column is
Hi Mike,
Some responses follow. Regards-Rick
Mike Matrigali wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Thanks, Kathy. I think I'm getting the message that the following
would be an acceptable and more traditional schedule:
August 10 : Last feature work commits
August 11 : First release candidate
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1417?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-1417:
--
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Committed 'derby-1417-1a-notImplemented.diff' into trunk with revision 417753.
Add new, lengthless
Kristian Waagan (JIRA) wrote:
I will add tests, but have to wait until the signatures have made it into
Mustang (I do have some tests already, but here I use the specific
implementation classes, not the interfaces).
It seems to me that it's completely appropriate for tests to use
specific
Separate writeScalarStream to methods which handle either encrypted or plain
streams.
-
Key: DERBY-1461
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1461
Project: Derby
Type:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1461?page=all ]
Tomohito Nakayama reassigned DERBY-1461:
Assign To: Tomohito Nakayama
Separate writeScalarStream to methods which handle either encrypted or plain
streams.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-822?page=comments#action_12418258 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-822:
--
Kathey Marsden wrote:
1) Queries may fail earlier. Instead of failing on the ResultSet
next() call, they may now
1. PGP signature verified.
2. MD5 sum verified
3. Derbyall run (in Dublin, at ApacheCon on my little laptop with Ubuntu
5.10) with 1 fail: derbyall/derbyall.fail:unit/T_Diagnosticable.unit
Seems to me to be DERBY-496 (Top of derby.log attached)
Platform:
Java Version:1.4.2_09
OS name:
Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Kristian Waagan (JIRA) wrote:
I will add tests, but have to wait until the signatures have made it
into
Mustang (I do have some tests already, but here I use the specific
implementation classes, not the interfaces).
It seems to me that it's completely appropriate
You are correct that using specific implementation classes is completely
appropriate in general. However, in this case, I would not be able to
*easily* share the test code between the embedded and the client driver
when running the JUnit test in our harness (I'm not very fond of the
master
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 417756/2006-06-28 15:53:05 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
2675673 2 160.28% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1459?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1459:
-
Attachment: bug1459_v02.diff
Attaching bug1459_v02.diff, which hopefully addresses Dan's concern. In this
version the public EmbeddedDriver has a rather
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-578?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden updated DERBY-578:
-
Attachment: derby578_06282006_diff.txt
In the interest of learning a little about a different code area I did a bit
of housekeeping on this patch.
Today is the deadline for ApacheCon US proposals.
-jean
Original Message
Subject: ApacheCon US 2006 CFP
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:15:37 -0700
From: Jean T. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: derby-dev@db.apache.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Derby Development
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1459?page=comments#action_12418285 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1459:
---
The functional description as you have outlined it sounds great and I think
would solve all the scenarios outlined. I haven't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Auto-generated mail]
*TinderBox_Derby* 417756/2006-06-28 15:53:05 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.5*
2675673 2 160.28% SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
I
Hi,
I recently submitted a patch (http://www.nabble.com/-PATCH-DERBY-1330-Collect-privilege-requirements-for-views-tf1858264.html#a5075008
)that tracks a view's(view descriptor)dependency on different privileges (PermissionsDescriptor)using the dependency manager which in turn saves these
This sounds like a perfect case for JMX soultion and can be added to
list of requirements on derby Wiki. Tracing options (enable/disable)
and perhaps the file name can be exposed as JMX operations. While
debugging the application the developers can start derby in JMX mode
and enable/disable
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1459?page=comments#action_12418294 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1459:
--
Hi Kathey,
With the new patch, the public interfaces should not change. Thanks for
recommending those tests. I will add them to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1459?page=comments#action_12418299 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1459:
--
The functional behaviour of EmbeddedDriver changes with this patch.
Previously calls to the java.sql.Driver
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
Hello derby-dev,
I have posted a new release candidate for 10.1.3 here:
http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/10.1.3.1/
+1
I tried the frameworks\NetworkServer batch files on Windows XP and the
nserverdemo/SimpleNetworkClientSample.java demo which worked ok.
My
Hi,
While was drafting the High Level Design document for JMX extensions I
thought of putting it up on the wiki for some early feedback.
The HLD can be accessed here :
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/High_Level_Design
Please note that:
1) This is draft document and is subject to constant
Hi, Sanket, thanks for this initial draft. Here are some comments.
Section 5.2
- I think you might to say Derby JMX Components because the last
section was a general overview of JMX, and one might think this was
still about JMX in general
- In the figure you have a JDBC Service MBean, but
- I think you might to say Derby JMX Components because the last
section was a general overview of JMX, and one might think this was
still about JMX in general
okay.
- In the figure you have a JDBC Service MBean, but in the table it's not
there and you have a Driver MBean. Are these the
Sanket Sharma wrote:
- I think it might be worth going int more detail on how a Model MBean
works since this is what you're proposing to use. I liked this text
from http://www.admc.com/blaine/howtos/jmx/ch06.html
Umm...I have mixed feelings on that. I initially thought a sperate
article
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1459?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1459:
-
Attachment: bug1459_v03.diff
Thanks for continuing to review these patches, Dan. I've attached another rev,
bug1459_v03.diff. I hope this is converging on a
I've been getting this question lately, so I started a Wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyPronunciation
Feel free to add your pronunciation to it.
-jean
+1
I verified my fixes and I believe this release has a good set of fixes
for a release. We should go with this release candidate. Thanks to
everyone who worked hard getting fixes in.
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
Hello derby-dev,
I have posted a new release candidate for 10.1.3 here:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-526?page=comments#action_12418338 ]
Manjula Kutty commented on DERBY-526:
-
Please add this to the Release Notes:
PROBLEM
NumberFormatException while trying to get connection to a Ipv6 server using the
ip
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1428?page=all ]
Mike Matrigali updated DERBY-1428:
--
Component: Services
(was: Store)
changing component from store to services. This is really a monitor issue.
Generating derby
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-283?page=comments#action_12418340 ]
Manjula Kutty commented on DERBY-283:
-
Please add thi to the Release Notes:
PROBLEM
UnknownHost Exception while trying to connect with NetworkClient on a Windows
dual
Test harness incorrectly catches db.lck WARNINGS generated during STORE tests
and lists the tests as failed in *_fail.txt.
--
Key: DERBY-1462
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-283?page=all ]
Manjula Kutty updated DERBY-283:
Derby Info: [Release Note Needed]
On IPv6/Ipv4 dual stack windows machines, the network server needs the
following jvm properties to be prefixed while
I have verfied that DERBY=1280 is a JVM bug specific to the reported IBM
JVM bug. What should I do with the jira issue?
Also any opinions on if the error message should be changed. Basically
all that the code knows is that it got an IO exception while trying to
write a page out, it does nest
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-526?page=all ]
Manjula Kutty updated DERBY-526:
Derby Info: [Release Note Needed]
Network Client URL cannot take the IP Address as host name for IPV6 machines
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-407?page=all ]
A B resolved DERBY-407:
---
Resolution: Fixed
The derby.optimizer.noTimeout workaround (as commited almost a year ago) allows
this test to run without failure and seems like the appropriate fix
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-407?page=all ]
A B closed DERBY-407:
-
predicatesIntoViews test failure on slow machine in Derby 10.1 branch version
201931
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1015?page=comments#action_12418344 ]
Sunitha Kambhampati commented on DERBY-1015:
Thanks for the feedbac, Dan.
Looking at this some more, I think it is better to define a new interface for
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-959?page=all ]
Sunitha Kambhampati reassigned DERBY-959:
-
Assign To: Sunitha Kambhampati
Allow use of DRDA QRYDTA block sizes greater than 32K
-
Noticed following javadoc warnings in trunk:
[javadoc]
opensource\java\engine\org\apache\derby\iapi\jdbc\BrokeredCallableStatement40.java:287:
warning - @param argument parameterIndex is not a parameter name.
[javadoc]
Resolve javadoc warnings in BrokeredCallableStatement40
---
Key: DERBY-1463
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1463
Project: Derby
Type: Bug
Components: Javadoc
Reporter: V.Narayanan
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1463?page=all ]
V.Narayanan reassigned DERBY-1463:
--
Assign To: V.Narayanan
Resolve javadoc warnings in BrokeredCallableStatement40
---
Key:
47 matches
Mail list logo