[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12674567#action_12674567
]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-4062:
---
I find this change confusing too.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12674568#action_12674568
]
Kristian Waagan commented on DERBY-4062:
I guess the DataValueFactory interface
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12674580#action_12674580
]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-4062:
---
The methods that have different
We are using Derby 10.1.3.2 and declared a column with Not null constraint
but what we are noticing that it still accept Null value in that column.
So i was wondering whether its a known issue / limitation.
Regards,
Partha Sarthi
Technical Consultant – BPM | IBM India Software Lab
IBM Software
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Knut Anders Hatlen resolved DERBY-4027.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 10.4.2.1
Derby Categories: [Data
Constraint causes wrong query result when using exists
--
Key: DERBY-4063
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4063
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Bug
Components: SQL
interaction between derby and jdk 1.5.0_17 causes core dump
---
Key: DERBY-4064
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4064
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Bug
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
primasol updated DERBY-4064:
Attachment: hs_err_pid156.log
core dump on winXP-jboss4.0.5
interaction between derby and jdk 1.5.0_17
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
primasol updated DERBY-4064:
Attachment: hs_err_pid600.log
winXP-jboss5.0.0
interaction between derby and jdk 1.5.0_17 causes core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
primasol updated DERBY-4064:
Environment:
windows XP SP3, jdk 1.5.0_17, jboss 4.0.5-GA
windows XP SP3, jdk 1.5.0_17, jboss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
primasol updated DERBY-4064:
Attachment: hs_err_pid30771.log
lin2.6.18-128.el5 - jboss5.0.0-GA
interaction between derby and jdk
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Rick Hillegas richard.hille...@sun.com wrote:
I prefer the first approach. I would like to summarize its features:
a) Any committer can bump the 4th digit of the release id without initiating
a community discussion. This lets people
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
primasol updated DERBY-4064:
Environment:
windows XP SP3, jdk 1.5.0_17, jboss 4.0.5-GA
windows Server 2003 SP2, jdk 1.5.0_17, jboss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12674630#action_12674630
]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-4064:
I think you need to pursue this with your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
primasol updated DERBY-4064:
Attachment: hs_err_pid5340_withDerby10.2.1.6.log
winServer2003sp2 - jboss405-GA - derby 10.2.1.6
Partha Sarthi wrote:
We are using Derby 10.1.3.2 and declared a column with Not null constraint
but what we are noticing that it still accept Null value in that column.
Can you provide a test script or test program which demonstrates this?
thanks,
bryan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bryan Pendleton updated DERBY-4062:
---
Description:
[ Issue title edited to reflect the discussion about how to clarify the
[Auto-generated mail]
*tinderbox_10.4_16* 745492/2009-02-18 13:17:32 CET
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Suite
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
022 085.00%
Issue Subscription
Filter: Derby: JIRA issues with patch available (9 issues)
Subscriber: derby-dev
Key Summary
DERBY-2201 Calling functions that return Blob/Clob does not work.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2201
DERBY-2389 DOCS - Move Derby system and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12674692#action_12674692
]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-646:
--
As Kristian mentioned, you can disable error
[Auto-generated mail]
*Daily* 745152/2009-02-17 18:00:19 MET
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Suite
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
lin
F:1,E:01091610915 0 1881.59% suitesAll
01313 0 .% jdbcapiAutoLoad
0
Rick Hillegas richard.hille...@sun.com writes:
Hi Andrew,
Can you help me understand why we need to add 2 new versions to JIRA
and not just 1? One of the versions means the next official release
on this branch. I understand what to do with that release id: I put
it in the fixed in field.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kristian Waagan updated DERBY-4040:
---
Attachment: derby-4040-2a-backport.diff
Attached the diff for the backport,
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Hi Rick,
My understanding is actually the opposite: 10.3.4.0 refers to the next
official release and should not be used for the fixed in field for the
fixes that we have committed. (At one point we may have used it to say
it is my intention to fix this bug for that
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Rick Hillegas richard.hille...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Can you help me understand why we need to add 2 new versions to JIRA and not
just 1? One of the versions means the next official release on this
branch. I understand what to do with that release id: I
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Rick Hillegas richard.hille...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Can you help me understand why we need to add 2 new versions to JIRA and not
just 1? One of the versions means the next official release on this
branch. I understand what to do
[Auto-generated mail]
*tinderbox_10.4_16* 745577/2009-02-18 18:17:36 CET
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Suite
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
022 085.00%
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12674816#action_12674816
]
Kim Haase commented on DERBY-2389:
--
Committed patch DERBY-2389-phase2.diff to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12674882#action_12674882
]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-4063:
This seems like an interesting problem. It
30 matches
Mail list logo