[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16985402#comment-16985402
]
Bernard commented on DERBY-5728:
Richard I appreciate your comments where you highlight the dilemma.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16985289#comment-16985289
]
Bernard commented on DERBY-5728:
Please let me add some context. It might be helpful, or even
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16971260#comment-16971260
]
Bernard commented on DERBY-5728:
Richard, Thanks for experimenting. Unfortunately, the suggested
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16971024#comment-16971024
]
Bernard commented on DERBY-5728:
Is there a chance to develop this? It's a feature parity issue, perhaps
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16890625#comment-16890625
]
Bernard edited comment on DERBY-5728 at 7/23/19 2:48 AM:
-
>From what I can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16890625#comment-16890625
]
Bernard edited comment on DERBY-5728 at 7/23/19 2:45 AM:
-
>From what I can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16890625#comment-16890625
]
Bernard commented on DERBY-5728:
>From what I can remember, it goes like this:
Imagine we have a client
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16890532#comment-16890532
]
Bernard commented on DERBY-5728:
Hi, I am the original requester. I do not want comment on the illegal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14133040#comment-14133040
]
Bernard commented on DERBY-5629:
Any progress on this after more than 2 years?
Queries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
bernard updated DERBY-5728:
---
Attachment: NullParameterEclipseLinkDerbyMaven.zip
EclipseLink Test Case
Add Support for
bernard created DERBY-5728:
--
Summary: Add Support for NULL IS NULL
Key: DERBY-5728
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5728
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Improvement
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
bernard updated DERBY-5728:
---
Attachment: NullParameterHibernateDerbyMaven.zip
Hibernate Test Case
Add Support for NULL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
bernard updated DERBY-5728:
---
Description:
The following query fails:
SELECT ID FROM CUSTOMER WHERE ((NULL IS NULL) OR (NAME = NULL))
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13262224#comment-13262224
]
bernard commented on DERBY-5728:
I think it it is different because it is more narrow in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1624?page=comments#action_12428464 ]
Emmanuel Bernard commented on DERBY-1624:
-
Yes it's a pretty big one :-)
Currently people cannot have query with both having and group by.
From our side,
Consider ANSI TRIM implementation
-
Key: DERBY-1623
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1623
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: SQL
Reporter: Emmanuel Bernard
use of direct column name rather than alias make aggregation fail (Hibernate
depends on that)
-
Key: DERBY-1624
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1624
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1624?page=comments#action_12424957 ]
Emmanuel Bernard commented on DERBY-1624:
-
Somehow related to DERBY-127
use of direct column name rather than alias make aggregation fail (Hibernate
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1624?page=comments#action_12424959 ]
Emmanuel Bernard commented on DERBY-1624:
-
All but Derby DB works fine with it
original issue from the hibernate dev list.
I am working on enhancing
19 matches
Mail list logo