[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1108?page=comments#action_12417208 ]
Manjula Kutty commented on DERBY-1108:
--
I have made a patch with the rs.next after the setTransactionIsolation and the
test passes with both ibm1.5 and sun jdk1.5.
> Th
A B (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1108?page=comments#action_12416921 ]
A B commented on DERBY-1108:
3) The test is not ok.
To test what it wants to test, that we can't change the isolation in the middle
of retrieving results o
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1108?page=comments#action_12416921 ]
A B commented on DERBY-1108:
> 3) The test is not ok.
> To test what it wants to test, that we can't change the isolation in the
> middle of retrieving results on a
> held cursor
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1108?page=comments#action_12416825 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1108:
---
Thanks Army for the comment. I think I understand escape analysis better now
and how it relatest to this issue and I think
1)
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1108?page=comments#action_12416823 ]
A B commented on DERBY-1108:
I'm not very well acquainted with this code, but based on the example of
"escape analysis" posted by the JVM team, I think I understand why this test
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1108?page=comments#action_12416665 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1108:
---
I told Manjula I would post the response from the IBM JVM Team and what I know
about the issue.
JVM TEAM RESPONSE:
I don't bel
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1108?page=comments#action_12370623 ]
Manjula Kutty commented on DERBY-1108:
--
Yes Kathey, You are right. When I commented out the gc(), I got the exception.
Will be informing the jvm people about this. Thanks
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1108?page=comments#action_12370621 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1108:
---
Actually maybe I had this backward. Maybe this JVM is being more agressive with
the gc(). Anyway, if your resultset is still r
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1108?page=comments#action_12370615 ]
Manjula Kutty commented on DERBY-1108:
--
No, The test does not close the resultSet explicitly
> The test jdbcapi/setTransactionIsolation.java fails with ibm jvm1.5
> -
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1108?page=comments#action_12370613 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1108:
---
Yes. It is so much harder when the problem is that you are *not* throwing the
error. You have to trace back through the code
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1108?page=comments#action_12370576 ]
Manjula Kutty commented on DERBY-1108:
--
The stack trace given by all other jvms other than ibm15 is like this :
ERROR X0X03: Invalid transaction state - held cursor requi
11 matches
Mail list logo
