[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=comments#action_12425779 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1639: -- Don't we have to respect Sun's naming scheme for jdk 1.6 and use Java SE 6?

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=comments#action_12425781 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1639: -- Sorry, I see the extract that is required by the JCP licence. Still don't understand what that means

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=comments#action_12425797 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1639: -- It probably depends on what the made available refers to. I read it as the Derby release itself,, and

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=comments#action_12425798 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1639: -- The release note should also include J2ME/CDC/Foundation 1.0 when it lists the list of Java

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=comments#action_12425819 ] Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1639: -- Before taking this to legal-discuss, maybe I could sand down the verbiage a bit to make it clear that the

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=comments#action_12425835 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1639: -- -1 on this change until it has been cleared through the legal-discuss and the DB-PMC. Rick, I

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=comments#action_12425901 ] Craig Russell commented on DERBY-1639: -- IANAL, but I don't think there is a problem. Derby is not an application. The only way you can run Derby that exposes

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

+1, I think what Craig says here makes sense. There is no way anybody can legally run in production with JDBC4 until Java SE 6 is declared GA. David Craig Russell (JIRA) wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1639?page=comments#action_12425901 ] Craig Russell

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1639) Include early-draft notice required by JDBC 4 spec license in NOTICES, release notes and documentation

David Van Couvering wrote: +1, I think what Craig says here makes sense. not sure This sentence seems unrelated to what Craig said. There is no way anybody can legally run in production with JDBC4 until Java SE 6 is declared GA. I think this fact is irrelvant, once Java SE 6 goes GA, the