[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12432891 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1646:
Laura, if that's the only change that went in #5 patch then +1 for commit from
me. Thanks
Documentation to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12432952 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1646:
Committed derby1646_5 to trunk with revision 440851. Please resolve and close
this issue if it is complete.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12432662 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1646:
--
Hi Mamta
In the following example, what is f as in f(T1.c3) ?
function?
CREATE VIEW s.v(vc1,vc2,vc3)
AS SELECT
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12432671 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1646:
Laura, f is a name of a function in following sql
CREATE VIEW s.v(vc1,vc2,vc3)
AS SELECT t1.c1,t1.c2,f(t1.c3)
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12432675 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1646:
--
Thank you for confirming that it is a function reference.
Please do NOT review the #3 patch/htm files. i definately
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12432741 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1646:
Laura, thanks for your patience. The changes look great and ready to be
committed after we remove the line When
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12432147 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1646:
Somme feedback
cdevcsecuregrantrevokeaccess.html
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12431948 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1646:
Laura, thanks for working on the documentation part of grant revoke. I have
following feedback
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12431634 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1646:
--
Mamta - I think that a new topic is needed to discuss this behavior.
With a title of Limitations of revoke
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12431655 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1646:
Laura, I feel that it should as a topic in the same page as the exsiting revoke
statement. This way, all the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12431674 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1646:
--
None of the other SQL statements have separate topics that discuss limitations.
Nor do they have sections within the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12431715 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1646:
That sounds fine, Laura.
Documentation to address Grant/Revoke Authorization for
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12431735 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1646:
--
Hi Mamta -
I ahve drafted the text for the table-level limitation. Please look it over and
see if I have captured
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12431738 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1646:
Laura, that's great. Now, you just have to do your magic for column level
privileges.
Documentation to address
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12430172 ]
Mamta A. Satoor commented on DERBY-1646:
One final area that requires documentation has to do with revoke privilege on
table/column levels.
Currently,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12428062 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1646:
--
This documentation issue is tied to Derby1057.
I believe that all of the documentation requirements for 1646
have
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12426331 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1646:
--
Thank you for your comments.
Before I start using connection access I want to make certain that we are not
making
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12426357 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1646:
--
I reread the sections on user authorization and user authentication... and I
now see that I was confused.
I will add
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12425935 ]
Satheesh Bandaram commented on DERBY-1646:
--
I think we need to document Derby Authorization mode and SQL standard
authorization mode in Derby. That is we
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12425943 ]
John H. Embretsen commented on DERBY-1646:
--
I noticed the following odd wording in the paragraph below These properties
work together:
... users can
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12425972 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1646:
--
I like it when Satheesh wrote:
I think it is important to be consistant about defaultConnectionMode
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12425983 ]
Satheesh Bandaram commented on DERBY-1646:
--
Thanks Dan... I missed correcting that from Laura's original description. It
was little too burried down, but
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12425841 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1646:
--
In Derby-1330 I asked some questions about the properties in the spec
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12425882 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1646:
--
3) In one way there are not really two models, Laura you put it well in some
other comment that said
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12425887 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1646:
--
Okay, I see what you mean.
I am not sure that we want to use coarse grained and fine grained as
descriptions for
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1646?page=comments#action_12425909 ]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1646:
--
I was very unhappy with the content of the file that describes setting the
default access mode.
So based on your
26 matches
Mail list logo
