[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12505561
]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1942:
--
Thank you for your work, Rick !
There exists difference
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12502895
]
Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1942:
--
How about this:
Application Changes Required
Applications that call
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12502986
]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1942:
--
Application still can use TIME data type in some situation ...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12502306
]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1942:
--
Thank you for brushing up the note :)
I think contents of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501516
]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1942:
--
I have started to write release note.
Please wait for a moment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501271
]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1942:
---
Tomohito said:
* Description of the patch
* Make it impossible to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1942?page=comments#action_12442640 ]
Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-1942:
--
Should this issue perhaps have the existing application impact and
release note needed flags set? It seems you have
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1942?page=comments#action_12442396 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1942:
--
Committed.
Sendingjava/engine/org/apache/derby/iapi/types/SQLTimestamp.java
Sending
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1942?page=comments#action_12441434 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1942:
--
This modification would affect DATETIMEDIFF scalar function.
Now DATETIMEDIFF function accept java.sql.TIME
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1942?page=comments#action_12441151 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1942:
--
Reading the spcec, java.sql.Time is not compatible to JDBC TIMESTAMP.
There exists difference between
10 matches
Mail list logo