[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1967?page=comments#action_12443195 ]
Yip Ng commented on DERBY-1967:
---
Thanks Army and Bryan for reviewing the patch. I also have backported this to
10.2 line and ran derbyall without any problems.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1967?page=comments#action_12442940 ]
A B commented on DERBY-1967:
I did some investigating around this and it appears that this query works in
10.1.2.1 but fails in 10.1.3 and later. I was eventually
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1967?page=comments#action_12442949 ]
Yip Ng commented on DERBY-1967:
---
Thanks Army, I just found the problem and running my patch against derbyall
currently. Some explanation of the problem:
In the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1967?page=comments#action_12443044 ]
Yip Ng commented on DERBY-1967:
---
derbyall passes.
From what Army described in previous comment, this looks like a regression.
UNION (ALL) contraint violation
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1967?page=comments#action_12443116 ]
A B commented on DERBY-1967:
Thanks for the quick turn-around on this, Yip.
Your description of the problem sounds correct to me and the changes themselves
match
