[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2014?page=comments#action_12447153 ]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-2014:
I'm ready to commit this, but I wanted to confirm the Javadoc change and am
having trouble running 'ant derbydocs'
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2014?page=comments#action_12447105 ]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-2014:
Thanks Yip! The new Javadoc is clear and detailed and very useful.
The new JUnit tests are also very clear and eas
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote (2006-10-31 08:01:03):
> [
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2014?page=comments#action_12445933
> ]
>
> Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2014:
> --
>
> The behaviour o
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2014?page=comments#action_12445976 ]
Yip Ng commented on DERBY-2014:
---
Sure, I'll be submitting a follow-up patch - addressing junit testcase
conversion + the javadoc issue in ValueNode.isEquivalent.
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2014?page=comments#action_12445969 ]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-2014:
Dan is this the Javadoc you are referring to?
http://db.apache.org/derby/javadoc/engine/org/apache/derby/impl/sql/c
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2014?page=comments#action_12445933 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-2014:
--
The behaviour of isEquivalent() is described by the javadoc comments for
ValueNode.isEquivalent().
Be
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2014?page=comments#action_12445862 ]
Yip Ng commented on DERBY-2014:
---
Thanks Manish and Bernt for reviewing the patch.
Bernt: Good question. If I am not mistaken, the isEquivalent() method is used
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2014?page=comments#action_12445854 ]
Bernt M. Johnsen commented on DERBY-2014:
-
I'm not sure what kind of equivalence isEquivalent, but is the following
correct?
+ // va
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2014?page=comments#action_12445682 ]
Manish Khettry commented on DERBY-2014:
---
The change to ConstantNode is fine. Thanks for finding and fixing this. On
adding tests for this bug: Would it be be