[jira] Commented: (DERBY-892) add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual function tests

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-892?page=comments#action_12415617 ] Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-892: -- We still have setIO permission in derby_tests.policy. I thought it should now be ok to take the setIO permission out, but To

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-892) add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual function tests

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-892?page=comments#action_12413558 ] Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-892: -- At least the failure makes sense without the file...Yes, I double checked on windows (sane) jars an classes, and (sane) ja

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-892) add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual function tests

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-892?page=comments#action_12413557 ] Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-892: --- Yes, I'm a bonehead for not noticing it before checking in patch_4. I just discovered that independently myself, and checked it i

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-892) add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual function tests

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-892?page=comments#action_12413550 ] Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-892: -- I am only now noticing that my util/useprocessfalse.policy file - added in patch _4_ never made it in with the check-in.

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-892) add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual function tests

On 5/25/06, Bryan Pendleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Myrna van Lunteren (JIRA) wrote:> Derbyall passed, except for a failure in unit/fillLog.unit, which failed on linux and solaris with jars, but not on windows with classes. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1346 perhaps?   Yes, I think

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-892) add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual function tests

Myrna van Lunteren (JIRA) wrote: Derbyall passed, except for a failure in unit/fillLog.unit, which failed on linux and solaris with jars, but not on windows with classes. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1346 perhaps? thanks, bryan

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-892) add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual function tests

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-892?page=comments#action_12413223 ] Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-892: -- Derbyall passed, except for a failure in unit/fillLog.unit, which failed on linux and solaris with jars, but not on windows

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-892) add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual function tests

On 5/23/06, Andrew McIntyre (JIRA) wrote:    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-892?page=comments#action_12413064 ]Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-892:---This looks good, but shouldn't we leave the permissions needed for ru

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-892) add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual function tests

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-892?page=comments#action_12413064 ] Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-892: --- This looks good, but shouldn't we leave the permissions needed for running tests in useprocess=false mode in the base harness pol

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-892) add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual function tests

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-892?page=comments#action_12413063 ] Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-892: -- I could not reproduce the problem with nist suite of DERBY-1337, not sure what I was doing wrong... But if someone who coul

Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-892) add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual function tests

On 5/18/06, Andrew McIntyre (JIRA) wrote:    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-892?page=comments#action_12412433 ]Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-892:---[...]I've gone ahead and committed what you have to the trunk with re

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-892) add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual function tests

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-892?page=comments#action_12412433 ] Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-892: --- Wow, thanks for cooking up a great patch from my half-baked idea. This looks good, I've gone ahead and committed what you have to

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-892) add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual function tests

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-892?page=comments#action_12402218 ] Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-892: -- I looked at the pre-patch, running the test derbynet/sysinfo.java and it seems to me this is a good step. However, the cal

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-892) add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual function tests

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-892?page=comments#action_12365438 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-892: - My concern with multiple complete files is keeping them all up to date, too easy for only one file to be modified. T

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-892) add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual function tests

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-892?page=comments#action_12365394 ] Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-892: -- Can you give an example of what kind of permissions would make sense to get added? i.e., to what section e.g. of the curren

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-892) add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual function tests

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-892?page=comments#action_12364513 ] David Van Couvering commented on DERBY-892: --- I vote for this too, I think this makes a lot of sense. > add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual functio

[jira] Commented: (DERBY-892) add mechanism for specifying policy file for individual function tests

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-892?page=comments#action_12364493 ] Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-892: - This is a good improvement. The best flexibility would be to have the option for a test to add permissions to a stan