[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory methods

2006-07-27 Thread Rick Hillegas (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=all ] Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1253: - Urgency: Normal Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory methods

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory methods

2006-06-06 Thread Rick Hillegas (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=all ] Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1253: - Attachment: bug1253_vanishedMethods.diff Attaching bug1253_vanishedMethods.diff. This makes the UnsupportedVetter test smart enough to handle methods which

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory methods

2006-05-31 Thread Rick Hillegas (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=all ] Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1253: - Attachment: bug1253_wireIn.diff Attaching bug1253_wireIn.diff. This adds the UnsupportedVetter test to the jdbc4 test suite. Committed at subversion

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory methods

2006-05-22 Thread Rick Hillegas (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=all ] Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1253: - Attachment: bug1253_forwarding.diff Committed bug1253_forwarding.diff at subversion revision 408772. This patch forwards some miscellaneous JDBC4 calls to

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory methods

2006-05-03 Thread Rick Hillegas (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=all ] Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1253: - Attachment: bug1253_verifier3_complianceChapter.diff Commmitted bug1253_verifier3_complianceChapter.diff at subversion revision 399482. This modifies the

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory methods

2006-05-02 Thread Dyre Tjeldvoll (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=all ] Dyre Tjeldvoll updated DERBY-1253: -- Attachment: derby-1253.v1.diff derby-1253.v1.stat Attaching a patch that updates the exclude map with additional interfaces and methods.

Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory methods

2006-05-02 Thread Lance J. Andersen
If you support a data type such as Blob/Clob, you must implement all methods on the interface, not pick and choose. If your backend does not support the data type, then all methods should throw SQLFeatureNotSupportedException. This was a problem in the earlier JDBC specs as it did not

Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory methods

2006-05-02 Thread Dyre . Tjeldvoll
Lance J. Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you support a data type such as Blob/Clob, you must implement all methods on the interface, not pick and choose. If your backend does not support the data type, then all methods should throw SQLFeatureNotSupportedException. This was a problem

Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory methods

2006-05-02 Thread Lance J. Andersen
Hi Dyre, yes that is correct, if you are supporting those data types it is expected that the required methods are there in order to provide developers with a consistent set of methods. It does not make sense to just pick and choose especially seeing these data types have been around in JDBC

Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory methods

2006-05-02 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lance J. Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you support a data type such as Blob/Clob, you must implement all methods on the interface, not pick and choose. If your backend does not support the data type, then all methods should throw

Missing JDBC3 methods, was: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory methods

2006-05-02 Thread Rick Hillegas
Hi Lance, Here's another gap between Derby's JDBC3 implementation and a reasonable interpretation of the spec: Currently, Derby supports CallableStatement methods of the form: getXXX( int paramNumber) and setXXX( int paramNumber, FOO paramValue ) but Derby does not implement the

Re: Missing JDBC3 methods, was: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory methods

2006-05-02 Thread Lance J. Andersen
Hi Rick, named parameters are optional WRT CallableStatements but they need to throw SQLFeatureNotSupportedException. This is also clarified in the JDBC 4 spec compliance chapter Rick Hillegas wrote: Hi Lance, Here's another gap between Derby's JDBC3 implementation and a reasonable

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory methods

2006-04-28 Thread Rick Hillegas (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=all ] Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1253: - Attachment: bug1253_verifier2.diff Committed bug1253_verifier2.diff at subversion revision 397926. This just exposes this test (which I have not wired into

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-1253) Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory methods

2006-04-26 Thread Rick Hillegas (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=all ] Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1253: - Attachment: bug1253_verifier.diff Attaching bug955_verifier.diff, which contains a junit test, UnsupportedVetter. This test lists out all of the methods