I'm having trouble applying this patch, but perhaps I'm not getting the
patch syntax correct. I've succeeded previously applying Jeff's patches
that modified just one file, and this is the first time I have tried to
apply a patch that modifies more than one file.
So, it modifies three files rel
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
By the way, I tried to apply this with the DITA source at revision
168249. Jeff, what was the revision of your local copy when you produced
the patch? --There is a backlog of patches to apply in Jira (and which
I'll try to catch up on). I'm wondering if it's possible this
I just created a new patch, and it seems that the
"src/" was left off the file names in the first patch.
Maybe that has something to do with it? I created
the attached diff from the trunk. Its also a more
current revision number.
Does it work?
--- "Jean T. Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I always use (in linux/unix)
patch -p0 < patchfile.diff
The -p0 means use the current path. For example, if the diff was
created in trunk, then if you are trying to patch in trunk, then I
always use -p0. If, for some reason, I was down one level in src, and
the diff was from the trunk, then I
--- scott hutinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I always use (in linux/unix)
>
> patch -p0 < patchfile.diff
>
> The -p0 means use the current path. For example, if
> the diff was
> created in trunk, then if you are trying to patch in
> trunk, then I
> always use -p0. If, for some reason, I w
I used this command last night to commit the patch for DERBY-234 and had
no problems:
patch -p0 -i derby234.diff
I'll try Jeff's new patch.
thanks,
-jean
Jeff Levitt wrote:
--- scott hutinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I always use (in linux/unix)
patch -p0 < patchfile.diff
The -p0 means use
Jeff Levitt wrote:
I just created a new patch, and it seems that the
"src/" was left off the file names in the first patch.
Maybe that has something to do with it? I created
the attached diff from the trunk. Its also a more
current revision number.
Does it work?
The patch applied without any err