Re: Difference in behaviour of Derby client and Embedded driver when doing a updateClob and a updateBlob

Knut Anders Hatlen wrote: V Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi, I was working on implementing updateClob/updateBlob methods on the network client when I noticed the following. 1) updateClob on a CHAR/VARCHAR/LONG VARCHAR column throws an exception on the Embedded Driver but not on the

Re: Difference in behaviour of Derby client and Embedded driver when doing a updateClob and a updateBlob

V Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > I was working on implementing updateClob/updateBlob methods on the > network client when I noticed the following. > > 1) updateClob on a CHAR/VARCHAR/LONG VARCHAR column throws an > exception on the Embedded Driver but not on the NetworkClient > 2) u

Difference in behaviour of Derby client and Embedded driver when doing a updateClob and a updateBlob

Hi, I was working on implementing updateClob/updateBlob methods on the network client when I noticed the following. 1) updateClob on a CHAR/VARCHAR/LONG VARCHAR column throws an exception on the Embedded Driver but not on the NetworkClient 2) updateBlob works on a CHAR/VARCHAR/LONG VARCHAR FOR