Re: Issues marked for fix in 10.2.2 in JIRA

2006-12-06 Thread Rick Hillegas
Daniel John Debrunner wrote: Rick Hillegas wrote: Hi Rajesh, Thanks for bringing up this topic. I have created a new Derby version in JIRA, 10.2.3.0. I think we can reassign most of these issues to 10.2.3.0. Why? Seems like having no fixin might be a better choice, otherwise the same exer

Re: Issues marked for fix in 10.2.2 in JIRA

2006-12-06 Thread Rick Hillegas
My apologies for the recent JIRA noise: I have moved the unassigned 10.2.2 issues to 10.2.3. That leaves us with 19 10.2.2 issues which are currently assigned. It would be very helpful if the assignees could take a look at these issues (just use Rajesh's filter link below). The assignees are in

Re: Issues marked for fix in 10.2.2 in JIRA

2006-12-06 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
Rick Hillegas wrote: Hi Rajesh, Thanks for bringing up this topic. I have created a new Derby version in JIRA, 10.2.3.0. I think we can reassign most of these issues to 10.2.3.0. Why? Seems like having no fixin might be a better choice, otherwise the same exercise will happen when 10.2.3.0

Re: Issues marked for fix in 10.2.2 in JIRA

2006-12-06 Thread Rick Hillegas
Hi Rajesh, Thanks for bringing up this topic. I have created a new Derby version in JIRA, 10.2.3.0. I think we can reassign most of these issues to 10.2.3.0. Regards, -Rick Rajesh Kartha wrote: Hi, I noticed in JIRA there are about 87 issues marked for fix in 10.2.2, Here is a filter to g

Issues marked for fix in 10.2.2 in JIRA

2006-12-05 Thread Rajesh Kartha
Hi, I noticed in JIRA there are about 87 issues marked for fix in 10.2.2, Here is a filter to get only these issues from JIRA: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12311442 Not sure how many of them will make it to the 10.2.2 release. Only 3 of them (