Re: Failure in lang/compressTable.sql with current 10.3 branch

2007-11-26 Thread Ole Solberg
Bryan Pendleton wrote: > Ole Solberg wrote: > >> I guess r566353 needs to be backported to 10.3 as well: > > Thanks Ole and Henri! > > I agree, that change looks like a perfect match for the diff I was > seeing in compressTable. > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/db/derby/code/trunk/java/testing/

Re: Failure in lang/compressTable.sql with current 10.3 branch

2007-11-24 Thread Bryan Pendleton
Ole Solberg wrote: I guess r566353 needs to be backported to 10.3 as well: Thanks Ole and Henri! I agree, that change looks like a perfect match for the diff I was seeing in compressTable. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/db/derby/code/trunk/java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/mas

Re: Failure in lang/compressTable.sql with current 10.3 branch

2007-11-22 Thread Ole Solberg
Henri van de Scheur wrote: Hi Bryan! I also see it in my daily tests on 10.3. Look for instance at http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/10.3Branch/jvm1.4/FailReports/596747_bySig.html It started to appear the 20th of November, so that might help? It appears on all platforms and under all jvm-

Re: Failure in lang/compressTable.sql with current 10.3 branch

2007-11-22 Thread Henri van de Scheur
Hi Bryan! I also see it in my daily tests on 10.3. Look for instance at http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/10.3Branch/jvm1.4/FailReports/596747_bySig.html It started to appear the 20th of November, so that might help? It appears on all platforms and under all jvm-versions. (see http://dbtg.thr