On 6/30/06, Jean T. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick's plan looks good to me as long as the license is resolved -- and
it looks like it will be (with time to spare) given Lance's
clarification of the mid July target in
Thanks to everyone for their suggestions and patience. After discussing
the JCP issues with many people, including Geir Magnusson and Lance
Andersen, I would like to propose the following approach for uncoupling
the Mustang and Derby release trains.
1) Lance will publish his proposed final
On 6/30/06, Rick Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Lance will publish his proposed final draft (PFD) of the JDBC4 spec
under the early access license.
Is there a rough time frame for this, considering it's the gating
factor for getting the release train rolling? Is it safe to assume
that
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 6/30/06, Rick Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Lance will publish his proposed final draft (PFD) of the JDBC4 spec
under the early access license.
Is there a rough time frame for this, considering it's the gating
factor for getting the release train
July towards the middle (after the Sun shutdown)
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 6/30/06, Rick Hillegas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Lance will publish his proposed final draft (PFD) of the JDBC4 spec
under the early access license.
Is there a rough time frame for this, considering it's the gating
Rick's plan looks good to me as long as the license is resolved -- and
it looks like it will be (with time to spare) given Lance's
clarification of the mid July target in
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Revised-10.2-plan-for-uncoupling-the-Mustang-and-Derby-release-trains-p5125470.html
-jean
Rick
This looks good to me, +1. Thanks to everyone for their hard work on
resolving this.
David
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Thanks to everyone for their suggestions and patience. After discussing
the JCP issues with many people, including Geir Magnusson and Lance
Andersen, I would like to propose the
