dag.wan...@oracle.com (Dag H. Wanvik) writes:
> Myrna van Lunteren writes:
>
>> I noticed this failing when I looked at the jdk 1.7 nightly tests a
>> couple of days ago, and mentioned it in an email...I am more focused
>> on 10.8.2 at the moment though.
>
> :) Very understandable.
>
>>
>> Althou
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Mamta Satoor wrote:
> I will take a look at DERBY-5409. When I ran the tests on my machine
> before checking in changes for DERBY-5044, I didn't see the error for
> grant revoke test. But I will take a look.
>
> thanks,
> Mamta
You'd need Java 7.
Ibm 1.6 and Jdk 1.
I will take a look at DERBY-5409. When I ran the tests on my machine
before checking in changes for DERBY-5044, I didn't see the error for
grant revoke test. But I will take a look.
thanks,
Mamta
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Dag H. Wanvik wrote:
> Myrna van Lunteren writes:
>
>> I noticed t
Myrna van Lunteren writes:
> I noticed this failing when I looked at the jdk 1.7 nightly tests a
> couple of days ago, and mentioned it in an email...I am more focused
> on 10.8.2 at the moment though.
:) Very understandable.
>
> Although it definitely popped up after that change to the test fo
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Dag H. Wanvik wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> With my last "svn up I" I see the following failure when I run with Java
> 7 (not with 6), sane classes or sane jars (I didn't test insane), on
> Solaris 11.
>
> It seems the recent checkin 1167226 introduced this failure. Should I
Hi,
With my last "svn up I" I see the following failure when I run with Java
7 (not with 6), sane classes or sane jars (I didn't test insane), on
Solaris 11.
It seems the recent checkin 1167226 introduced this failure. Should I
log an issue?
Caveat, there are knows issues with the first Java 7
