+1 to a 10.15.2 maintenance release.
I have no particular opinion about Java 9 versus Java 11 (in many of
my environments I am still using Java 8/Derby 10.14 quite
successfully, in fact.)
bryan
On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 10:47 AM Davide Grandi wrote:
>
> May be
> 10.15.2 realeased with
May be
10.15.2 realeased with Java 9
10.15.3-SNAPSHOT in development with Java 11 (or whatever is the next
development name)
?
Bye,
Davide
On 05/01/2020 18:48, Rick Hillegas wrote:
It's been a year since we produced a Derby release. No significant
feature work
It's been a year since we produced a Derby release. No significant
feature work has gone into the code since then. But I would be happy to
manage a 10.15.2 maintenance release in order to roll up the handful of
bug fixes which have accumulated over the last year.
The only reason I can see for
Thanks, Bryan. I am leaning toward a 10.14.1 feature release for two
reasons:
1) We have at least one new feature which requires hard-upgrade.
2) The 10.14.1 release notes can serve as our announcement that we are
sunsetting support for Java 8 in the next (10.15.1) release.
I have updated
I, too, would like to see a Derby release prior to summer 2018.
I am comfortable with either proposal.
Thanks for volunteering to make this happen! I'll chip in as much as I can.
bryan
Alternatively, we could produce a 10.14.1 release which exposes the
recent work on autoincrement columns. The JDK9-focussed release could be
called 10.15.1.
On 6/17/17 8:11 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Someone on the user list has asked about our plans for upcoming
releases. Here are my thoughts:
Someone on the user list has asked about our plans for upcoming
releases. Here are my thoughts:
o I was planning on managing a 10.14.1 release which would build and run
cleanly on JDK 9. The idea would be that the code would not build or run
on previous versions of the JDK, due to our limited
