Thank you, I'll take a look at C-JDBC. I'm actually a little surprised how fast I got an answer to all my questions. Thank you to everyone. James-Rajesh Kartha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -To: Derby Discussion From: Rajesh Kartha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: 09/22/2005 11:24AMSubject: Re: Distri
Thanks for the pointer to this presentation, Oyvind. It's a pretty
startling observation though I'm not sure how to use it. I'd be
interested in hearing your thoughts about this some time.
Cheers,
-Rick
That reminds me of a very entertaining presentation which was held at
VLDB this year:
James A Craig/O/VCU wrote:
Hi, I'm fairly new to Derby but I was curious if its possible to use
it in a distributed setup. I currently have a small cluster and want
to set it up so that I have a distributed database on it using Derby.
So my questions are:
1) Is this possible?
2) Is there a r
Michael Vinca wrote:
> Hello,
> I wasn't sure if this was going to work or not. There was nothing in the
> documentation to suggest it would, I was just hopeful. I tried searching
> the archives for "createFrom" but only got one hit, so I hope this is
> not a repeat question.
> I am attempting to
James A Craig/O/VCU wrote:
> Thank you for the fast response. I was looking to set it up so that it
> was a single database with table 1 on node 1, table 2 on node 2, etc.
> But if I'm reading what you said correctly, this isn't possible. I was
> reading a book that dealt with doing this and I want
Carlos A. Carnero Delgado wrote:
Hi,
if you will ultimately access your database using JDBC, you might want
to check this: http://c-jdbc.objectweb.org/. I'm not sure if that fits
the bill in your situation but you could waste 5 minutes reading the
blurbs there ;)
Emmanuel Cecchet wrote a "HOWT
Hi,
if you will ultimately access your database using JDBC, you might want
to check this: http://c-jdbc.objectweb.org/. I'm not sure if that fits
the bill in your situation but you could waste 5 minutes reading the
blurbs there ;)
Regards,
Carlos.
Thank you for the fast response. I was looking to set it up so that it was a single database with table 1 on node 1, table 2 on node 2, etc. But if I'm reading what you said correctly, this isn't possible. I was reading a book that dealt with doing this and I wanted to try it out in practice (it di
On Thursday 22 September 2005 04:07, Øystein Grøvlen wrote:
> > "JAC" == James A Craig/O/VCU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> JAC> Hi, I'm fairly new to Derby but I was curious if its possible
> JAC> to use it in a distributed setup. I currently have a small
> JAC> cluster and want t
Hi!
We're using Derby version 10.1 (Bundle-Version: 10.1.100.208786)
embeddedly in our system. Even though I've put extensive rollback and
statement closing handling in the code, we still occasionally see cases
where a table gets permanently locked after an error during update
(detail below).
James A Craig/O/VCU wrote:
4) Does anyone know of any decent tutorials when it comes to Derby? I
haven't found anything that great thus far.
The recent Linux Magazine article referenced in a previous thread on
this mailing list might function as a sort of general tutorial for
(newbie) derby
> "JAC" == James A Craig/O/VCU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JAC> Hi, I'm fairly new to Derby but I was curious if its possible
JAC> to use it in a distributed setup. I currently have a small
JAC> cluster and want to set it up so that I have a distributed
JAC> database on it usin
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Hi Oyvind,
I agree that this is inelegant. As you note, this approach step by step
forces a plan which the current Derby optimizer is capable of
considering--with or without the covering index. Regardless of whether
we teach the optimizer some better tricks, I think it's
13 matches
Mail list logo
