10.2 release delay

2006-09-20 Thread Robert Enyedi
Today I was prepared to download the 10.2 final release just to see that it has been delayed to October 11 (http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/TenTwoRelease?action=diffrev2=42rev1=39). I think that it would have been nicer if the developers deciding the delay would have posted in time about

Re: 10.2 release delay

2006-09-20 Thread Robert Enyedi
And what exactly is the reason of the delay? Are you planning to introduce new features or fix more bugs? Regards, Robert Robert Enyedi wrote: Today I was prepared to download the 10.2 final release just to see that it has been delayed to October 11

Re: 10.2 release delay

2006-09-20 Thread Rick Hillegas
Hi Robert, I updated the wiki a few days ago because I noticed that the original dates were clearly stale--we had already slipped by a couple weeks. I pushed the projected dates out long enough to allow for a couple release candidates in case our first attempt flops. Discussion about release

Re: 10.2 release delay

2006-09-20 Thread Robert Enyedi
Hi Rick, Thanks for the update on the release status. We all are looking forward to the release candidate and keep up the great work! Regards, Robert Rick Hillegas wrote: Hi Robert, I updated the wiki a few days ago because I noticed that the original dates were clearly stale--we had

Performance of IN operator

2006-09-20 Thread Christine Johnson
Hello, fellow Derby users I have a table like this: CREATE TABLE Things ( thingIdx BIGINT NOT NULL GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY, thingName VARCHAR(80) NOT NULL, ... // bunch of other columns not relevant to my problem CONSTRAINT Things_PK PRIMARY KEY (thingIdx) ) I find that

RE: Performance of IN operator

2006-09-20 Thread Michael Segel
I believe that this is a known Derby defect. Does anyone know if this is fixed in the upcoming release? From: Christine Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 3:48 PM To: Derby Discussion Subject: Performance of IN operator Hello,

Re: Performance of IN operator

2006-09-20 Thread Bryan Pendleton
SELECT thingIdx, thingName FROM Things WHERE thingIdx IN (?, ?, ?, ?, ... [100 values scattered throughout index]) performance is pretty slow -- a bit over a minute for 100 records. I believe this is DERBY-47 (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-47), also logged as DERBY-713

Re: Performance of IN operator

2006-09-20 Thread Christine Johnson
From: Bryan Pendleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Derby Discussion derby-user@db.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 3:55 PM Subject: Re: Performance of IN operator SELECT thingIdx, thingName FROM Things WHERE thingIdx IN (?, ?, ?, ?, ... [100 values scattered throughout index])

Unsubscribe from mailing list

2006-09-20 Thread Max Ten
I had tried to unsubscribe bysend a blank email to mailing address but didn't work. Wish to know is there any option i can unsubscribe? Thank you.

Re: Unsubscribe from mailing list

2006-09-20 Thread Andrew McIntyre
On 9/20/06, Max Ten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had tried to unsubscribe by send a blank email to mailing address but didn't work. Wish to know is there any option i can unsubscribe? Thank you. To unsubscribe from derby-user, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you are subscribed to the

RE: Unsubscribe from mailing list

2006-09-20 Thread Marl Atkins
You can't unsubscribe!! Just kidding grin From: Max Ten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 12:56 AMTo: derby-user@db.apache.orgSubject: Unsubscribe from mailing list I had tried to unsubscribe bysend a blank email to mailing address but didn't work. Wish to