Re: multiple webapps many embedded vs single network

2006-10-30 Thread Ron Chan
abase at any given time; just export the schema for the given > application, load it in the new database, and change your connection > string to hit the new database. > > Dan > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/multiple-webapps-many-embedded-vs-single-network-tf2522906.html#a7071921 Sent from the Apache Derby Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: multiple webapps many embedded vs single network

2006-10-29 Thread Jean T. Anderson
Michael Segel wrote: >>-Original Message- >>From: Jean T. Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 1:32 PM >>To: Derby Discussion >>Subject: Re: multiple webapps many embedded vs single network >> >>Michael Segel wrote:

Re: multiple webapps many embedded vs single network

2006-10-29 Thread Dan Scott
On 29/10/06, Michael Segel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Jean T. Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 1:32 PM > To: Derby Discussion > Subject: Re: multiple webapps many embedded vs single network &g

RE: multiple webapps many embedded vs single network

2006-10-29 Thread Michael Segel
> -Original Message- > From: Jean T. Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 1:32 PM > To: Derby Discussion > Subject: Re: multiple webapps many embedded vs single network > > Michael Segel wrote: > ... > > Derby wasn't d

Re: multiple webapps many embedded vs single network

2006-10-29 Thread Jean T. Anderson
Michael Segel wrote: ... > Derby wasn't designed to be a central database to multiple apps. So its not > efficient in that role. Note: This is in comparison to IDS, DB2, Oracle. > Derby is not one of those. It lacks the features that they have to act as a > centralized DB, however it does have a mu

RE: multiple webapps many embedded vs single network

2006-10-28 Thread Michael Segel
> -Original Message- > From: Ron Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 5:52 AM > To: derby-user@db.apache.org > Subject: Re: multiple webapps many embedded vs single network > > > I guess either way, derby allows me to do this eas

Re: multiple webapps many embedded vs single network

2006-10-28 Thread Ron Chan
hat do you do? > > > Sent via BlackBerry. > > -Mike Segel > Principal > MSCC > 312 952 8175 > > > -Original Message- > From: Ron Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:23:27 > To:derby-user@db.apache.org > Subject: multipl

Re: multiple webapps many embedded vs single network

2006-10-27 Thread Michael Segel
-Original Message- From: Ron Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:23:27 To:derby-user@db.apache.org Subject: multiple webapps many embedded vs single network Hi For multiple webapps on a single tomcat instance, is it better to have separate embedded databases i

multiple webapps many embedded vs single network

2006-10-27 Thread Ron Chan
http://www.nabble.com/multiple-webapps-many-embedded-vs-single-network-tf2522906.html#a7037681 Sent from the Apache Derby Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.