Hi Cor,
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Hi Mirek, *,
>
> Mirek M. wrote (24-10-12 23:47)
>
>
> We're in the middle of our option analysis [1] and we'd like to know
>> whether the following options are still needed and, if so, what their
>> use cases are:
>> - "Screen font an
Hi Mirek, *,
Mirek M. wrote (31-10-12 20:21)
Hi Kendy,
Astron told me that it may have been you who introduced the topic of
designing some T-shirts for FOSDEM, so I'm turning to you with a few
questions:
1) Why turn to the design team and not the marketing team?
2) How are they supposed to be br
Hi Mirek,
Mirek M. wrote (01-11-12 00:19)
[...]
So, rather than owner, I'd prefer to use the term caretaker. The caretaker
would:
a) make sure that the work on the project is progressing smoothly
b) provide updates about it at the weekly IRC chat
c) be in charge of communication with developers
Hi *,
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Kingswells Computercraft
wrote:
FYI: that with "off-list" didn't work out, in case you really intended
to only send it off-list..
List strips attachments, so having me in cc did help me getting the image :-)
> Thanks too, Christian, you seem to "get" what
Hi :)
Errr, probably better to upload it to a relevant page on the wiki and place it
fairly sensibly. The lists strip attachments so we never get them but we can
all reach the wiki.
Alternatively you could use the Nabble interface
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/nabble-mailing-list-inter
Thanks Tom, thanks for listening. I was beginning to feel like no-one
was listening, or wanted to even consider what I was talking about. Not
a pleasant experience in my first attempt to contribute.
Thanks too, Christian, you seem to "get" what I mean. On some of the
links I followed from y
HI *,
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Kingswells Computercraft
wrote:
>
> It is the main LO icon I'm talking about; it's not so much what's wrong
> with it, so much as what it lacks - as I stated in my original message:
I don't think it is our main Logo that is lacking something - simple
is bea
> No I've never read the source code, [...] Does that mean I'm excluded from
> the club?
No, but it means you shouldn't assume it is all beauty and elegance inside.
> "A bright yellow rectangle, bordering a graphic of whatever is the current
> content" would be my description.
So on the www.nat
No I've never read the source code, wouldn't know how to! I'm not a
programmer, merely one of many thousands of end users, who happens to be
in the business of PC support. Does that mean I'm excluded from the club?
> How would you describe the logo of National Geographic? <
"A bright yellow
> it is almost as if the wrapper for the product were blank!
> [...]
> National Geographic, [...]
How would you describe the logo of National Geographic? I think "an
empty rectangle, devoid of contents" comes pretty close. And they seem
to be doing fine, and their empty rectangle is instantly reco
10 matches
Mail list logo
