I respectfully disagree with Italo.
First, about the "frame of reference". In my opinion, decisions such as
major version number bumping are not, first and foremost, marketing
decisions. That is a _consideration_, since the version number is
declarative than technical. But - such an action sho
-- Forwarded message -
From: Musaab Imran
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 16:07
Subject: Improve OpenPGP encryption experience
To:
Hi I hope you are doing fine.
I wanted to ask you if you can guide me regarding the project " Improve
OpenPGP encryption experience" . What are your requi
Replied directly
On 28.03.23 10:26, Musaab Imran wrote:
-- Forwarded message -
From: Musaab Imran
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 16:07
Subject: Improve OpenPGP encryption experience
To:
Hi I hope you are doing fine.
I wanted to ask you if you can guide me regarding the project " I
I have been asked to provide my opinion by developers, who seem to think that
the change of version has to be a marketing decision. As I have said quite
clearly, I am pissed off by the current situation, where I am asked to take a
decision and then I am blamed because I take one. I leave the dec
I totally understand Italo's frustration. I also hate when I am expected to make a decision and people, who were absolutely silent and
indifferent before, suddenly start to verbalise their opinion, which "happens to be" different from mine.
Regarding the version number, I think people who liked
Hello all,
the design/UX meeting *next week* is
on: Thursday, Apr/06, 14:00 CEST resp. 12pm/noon UTC
at: https://jitsi.documentfoundation.org/design
Here is the agenda:
* No option to select "Delete Comment" via a letter press in the
context menu
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/s
Hi Italo,
the change from 6.x to 7.0 happens together with the change from ODF 1.2
to ODF 1.3. If the decision it to keep this kind of numbering, I think a
change to 8.0 should happen when LibreOffice starts support for ODF 1.4.
ODF 1.4 will hopefully be released end of 2024.
Kind regards,
R
