Le 14/06/2012 01:36, Mirek M. a écrit :
Another bother: font sizes.
It's quite annoying that headings 6-10 look identical, which means the
hierarchy doesn't get across. Adding fuel to the fire, the text below
headings 4-10 is actually bigger than the headings themselves. The
numbering before hea
Olivier Hallot skrev 2012-06-12 21:30:
The only attributes you can change on the built-in styles are in Tools -
Options - Writer - Basic fonts. When changing them, all new documents based
on the default template will carry the changes.
Forgot to look there before.
And there we got the Callibri
Hi Alex,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Alexander Wilms
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> would anyone object against Cedric including this as new default (empty)
> template:
>
>
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Avantgarde.ott
>
Based on a quick review, I found a number of problems with i
Hi all,
I see improvements and I see shortcomes. I'm no specialist, just want to point
things that jump to my eye.
First, I agree with most of Niklas comments. I see some hidden changes we
probably wouldn't want included: Calibri font in many styles, odd margins in
default page, custom styles
> Hi everyone,
>
> would anyone object against Cedric including this as new default (empty)
> template:
>
>
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Avantgarde.ott
>
> Alex
Hi,
I object to the use of serif fonts for default. It's the first thing I change.
Is it an American obsess
Hi
2012/6/12 Niklas Johansson
> Stefan Knorr (Astron) skrev 2012-06-12 20:19:
>
> Hi Olivier,
>>
>> First, the choice of fonts and colors are a matter of taste, which is an
>>> endless debate...
>>>
>> Sure, yet... staying with Arial and TNR, aping Office 2000 is not
>> really an option either
Stefan Knorr (Astron) skrev 2012-06-12 20:19:
Hi Olivier,
First, the choice of fonts and colors are a matter of taste, which is an
endless debate...
Sure, yet... staying with Arial and TNR, aping Office 2000 is not
really an option either, though.
Second, - I have not tested - LO may warn m
Hi Olivier,
> First, the choice of fonts and colors are a matter of taste, which is an
> endless debate...
Sure, yet... staying with Arial and TNR, aping Office 2000 is not
really an option either, though.
> Second, - I have not tested - LO may warn me that my legacy documents have
> new defaul
Hi
Sorry to jump in so late, I am a bit scared if I undestand this template as
"all my new documents will be based on this template".
First, the choice of fonts and colors are a matter of taste, which is an
endless debate...
Second, - I have not tested - LO may warn me that my legacy documents h
Hi
I love it that someone finely started to look at the default styles.
There are much
room for improvement. Besides Astrons comments I'd like to ask:
Before I begin I'd like to say that I think there are a lot of potential
in this template.
Keep that in mind if I start to sound bitter. :)
Hi Alex,
Overall: great. I like the coloured accent very much.
There are a couple things, though:
#1 Would you mind removing the small-caps from the headlines? These
aren't font-provided small caps, but forced ones whose proportions
differ from what a typographer would provide with a font (i. e.
Hi everyone,
would anyone object against Cedric including this as new default (empty)
template:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Avantgarde.ott
Alex
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mail
12 matches
Mail list logo
