And here's the direct link if you are reading the nabble thread:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AsGS28t6YMF3dHFrTm9hMzZVNk9hNEZMN0NSbV9ZbXc#gid=0
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/4-0-Branding-poll-tp4032751p4033157.html
Sent from the Design mai
Hi everyone,
The vote moved to Google Docs, please take a look at the "4.0 branding -
current summarize" thread.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: htt
I agree, I have added my vote to the first email and then all follow the
email with lot of votes, don`t know if I were wrong or it was like expected.
2013/1/29 Paul Greindl
> Ähh I think it was intended to add the votes to the last mail, but then
> people stopped doing so, so now I think it's b
Ähh I think it was intended to add the votes to the last mail, but then
people stopped doing so, so now I think it's best to just send your vote
and put everything in place later.
And yes, I completely agree: this is a little chaotic and the vote
should be redone with a voting system!
Paul
On 2
Hi,
I'm not sure how the voting system is supposed to work. I took the last
email, and added my votes to that. Others took the plain list from the
first mail and added their votes to that.
What is the right way?
Maybe an online voting system would help?
Samuel
Am 29.01.2013 08:49, schrieb k
Le 29/01/2013 15:33, Michel Renon a écrit :
Le 29/01/2013 13:39, Daniel A. Rodriguez a écrit :
Agree, for now, I guess it would be good if we all voted like Adolfo
above. Else, we'll just stumble over lots of calculation errors (people
posting at the same time etc.).
(Imho, a saner mechanism wou
Le 29/01/2013 13:39, Daniel A. Rodriguez a écrit :
Agree, for now, I guess it would be good if we all voted like Adolfo
above. Else, we'll just stumble over lots of calculation errors (people
posting at the same time etc.).
(Imho, a saner mechanism would have been to ask for everyone's top three
> Agree, for now, I guess it would be good if we all voted like Adolfo
> above. Else, we'll just stumble over lots of calculation errors (people
> posting at the same time etc.).
> (Imho, a saner mechanism would have been to ask for everyone's top three
> choices and give 3, 2, 1 points in order, r
Hi all,
+1: Mateus.m.luna "Clear_Full_Pref" [1]
+1: Maxim Darák (almost perfect)
+1: Proposal by Alexander Wilms (at the right of the new SVG) [2]
-1: "V2" by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila
-1: "V3" by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila
-1: Proposal by Pedro
-1: Proposal by H.Sparks
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 03:
Honestly, wth with this voting system? :)
+1: Mateus.m.luna "Clear_Full_Official" (make colors more vivid, please)
+1: G Sparks (I like the typographic motif as well, typeface choice
could be improved)
+1: Maxim Darák (almost perfect)
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.lib
I didn't Vote 3 or -3 I downvoted 1 which made -3 when added to -2 sorry !
2013/1/29 Sveinn í Felli
> Hi,
>
> ;-)
>
> +1: Mateus.m.luna "Clear_Green_Official" (the green could be darker)
> +1: "Minimal" by Medieval* (the green could be darker)
> +1: "ages" by Medieval* (the green could be dark
Hi,
;-)
+1: Mateus.m.luna "Clear_Green_Official" (the green could be
darker)
+1: "Minimal" by Medieval* (the green could be darker)
+1: "ages" by Medieval* (the green could be darker)
+1: Alexander Wilms (both greens top-right in the new SVG)
+1: G Sparks (I like the typographic motif)
-1: A
Hi Kévin, Samuel and all voters,
we should avoid such things like "-3".
Am 29.01.2013 08:24, schrieb Kévin PEIGNOT:
"V2" by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: -3
Everybody has one vote for or against and do it so.
At least doing such changes at a legal vote is making your whole vote
uncountable in
I support the decision of the Design team! Voted for Maxim Darák. Downvoted the
3.6 branding.
Branding from version 3.6: -1
Proposal by Aexyn.com: 0
"V1" by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: -1
"V2" by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: -3
"V3" by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: -3
"GIn-V1" by k-j: -2
"GIn-V2" by
>
> Hello!
>
> Branding from version 3.6: 0
> Proposal by Aexyn.com: 0 +
> "V1" by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: -1 -
> "V2" by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: -3 -
> "V3" by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: -3 -
> "GIn-V1" by k-j: -2
> "GIn-V2" by k-j: -2
> "Minimal" by Medieval: -1
> "ages" by Medieval: -1
>
Hello!
>>> Branding from version 3.6: 0
>>> Proposal by Aexyn.com: -1
>>> "V1" by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: 0
>>> "V2" by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: -2
>>> "V3" by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: -2
>>> "GIn-V1" by k-j: -2
>>> "GIn-V2" by k-j: -2
>>> "Minimal" by Medieval: -1
>>> "ages" by Medieval:
>> Branding from version 3.6: 0
>> Proposal by Aexyn.com: -2
>> "V1" by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: 0
>> "V2" by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: -2
>> "V3" by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: -2
>> "GIn-V1" by k-j: -2
>> "GIn-V2" by k-j: -2
>> "Minimal" by Medieval: -1
>> "ages" by Medieval: -1
>> Prop
The proposals are at
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Whiteboards/4.0_Branding.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Mirek M. wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Mirek M. wrote:
>
>> Because of disagreements over the 4.0 branding, we're setting up a poll
>> to help us reach a solu
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Mirek M. wrote:
> Because of disagreements over the 4.0 branding, we're setting up a poll to
> help us reach a solution.
>
> To vote for a proposal, add 1 to the number next to it. To vote against
> it, subtract 1. You may vote for as many proposals as you'd like
19 matches
Mail list logo
