On 08/13/2016 08:13 PM, Stephen Michel wrote: > <snip> > > On August 13, 2016 12:18:48 PM EDT, Michael Siepmann > <m...@techdesignpsych.com> wrote: >> Great idea, incorporated into >> http://snowdrift.sylphs.net/f/a87dd65116/?raw=1 >> >> Not shown in the mockup is what it would say in the simpler case where >> the full amount is paid off at once, for which I'd suggest: >> >> "Amount postponed from March-April 2016" > Also, the parenthetical amount of money postponed is no longer necessary, and > the words explaining that it was postponed can be moved elsewhere. The $0.00 > could also be removed (or replaced with "postponed"), though there's > arguments why we should keep it as well.
I think we should keep it as it is, for two reasons: (a) it's good to consistently have the number at the bottom be both (i) the amount actually charged and (ii) the sum of the numbers above it, and (b) when there are multiple pledges the number in parentheses will show the sum of them, so when in a later month you see either "Part of $2.80 postponed..." or "Amount postponed... $2.80" you can easily match that up to the ($2.80) it corresponds to.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Design mailing list Design@lists.snowdrift.coop https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/design
